Research › Search › Judgment

Calcutta High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 44089 (CAL)

THE STATE v. SUMITRA MONDAL

FAT/883/1992 · 2026-09-28

Atarup Banerjee, Ravi Krishan Kapur

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

D/L.51. September 28, 2026. KAUSHIK. FAT 883 of 1992 CAN 1 of 1999 (Old CAN 5147 of 1999) CAN 2 of 2000 (Old CAN 464 of 2000) The State Vs. Sumitra Mondal None appears on behalf of the parties nor is any adjournment prayed for even in the second call. It appears from the records that the defects pointed out by the Department as far back as in 21 September, 1992 have not been cured. There is 119 days delay. No application for condonation of delay has yet been filed. In view of the non-appearance of the parties, FAT 883 of 1992 along with connected interlocutory applications stands dismissed for default. Interim orders, if any, stand vacated. (Ravi Krishan Kapur, J.) (Atarup Banerjee, J.)