[2026:RJ-JP:16064] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 5713/2023 1. Omprakash Bajya S/o Shri Hanuman Singh, Aged About 39 Years, R/o Syota Ka Bas, Sihotbadi, District Sikar (Raj.). 2. Jitendra Kumar S/o Shri Bajrang Lal, Aged About 38 Years, R/o Village And Post Ghorjwala Khurd, Tehsil Ghoribara Khurd, District Jhunjhunu (Raj.). 3. Sukhvinder Singh S/o Shri Dayanand, Aged About 39 Years, R/o Udamandi, Jhunjhunu (Raj.). 4. Mohammad Hakim Khan S/o Shri Bholu Khan, Aged About 38 Years, R/o Village And Post Khunkhuna, Tehsil Didwana, District Nagaur (Raj.). 5. Rakesh Kumar Swami S/o Shri Mahabeer Prasad, Aged About 38 Years, R/o Village Nakawali, Ganwali, Dayal Ki Nagal, District Sikar (Raj.) 6. Dharmveer S/o Shri Shaitana Ram, Aged About 37 Years, R/o Kalwa, District Jhunjhunu (Raj.). ----Petitioners Versus 1. The State Of Rajasthan, Through Its Principal Secretary, Department Of Secondary Education, Govt. Of Rajasthan, Govt. Secretariat, Jaipur (Raj.). 2. The Director, Department Of Secondary Education, Govt. Of Rajasthan, Bikaner (Raj.). 3. The Rajasthan Public Service Commission, Through Its Secretary, Ghoogra Ghati, Ajmer (Raj.). 4. The Joint Director, Department Of Secondary Education, Govt. Of Rajasthan, Bikaner (Raj.). 5. Balaram Gurjar S/o Shri Khamba Ram Gurjar, Aged About 40 Years, Roll No. 439329, Through The Director, Department Of Secondary Education, Govt. Of Rajasthan, Bikaner (Raj.). 6. Sajna Ram, S/o Shri Dula Ram, Aged About 42 Years, Roll No. 810450, Through The Director, Department Of Secondary Education, Govt. Of Rajasthan, Bikaner (Raj.). ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Akshit Gupta Mr. Shreyansh Dhariwal Ms. Pragya Seth Mr. Kamalesh Sharma [2026:RJ-JP:16064] (2 of 2) [CW-5713/2023] Mr. Nupul Bansal Mr. Pallav Pancholi For Respondent(s) : Mr. M.F. Baig Mr. Devansh Sharma HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI CHIRANIA Order 16/04/2026 Learned counsel for the petitioners submit that by the present writ petition, he confines his arguments with respect to the benefit of notional pay fixation and other consequential benefits and has no grievance regarding the posting at specific place. Learned counsel for the respondent did not dispute the fact that the petitioners are entitled for benefit of notional pay and other consequential benefits in terms of the law as laid down by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in various cases. In view of aforesaid submissions made by the learned counsel for both the parties, the respondents are directed to do notional fixation of pay and pay all other consequential benefits to the petitioner to which he is entitled under the law within a period of three months from the date of passing of this order. It is expected that the respondents will not make any unnecessary delay in making the payment of the benefits. In view of the above, the present writ petition is disposed of. All pending applications, if any, stand disposed of. (RAVI CHIRANIA),J Dushyant/68