- 1 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010540652026 NC: 2026:KHC:54843 WP No. 24457 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 1ST DAY OF OCTOBER, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K. V. ARAVIND WRIT PETITION NO. 24457 OF 2026 (GM-CPC) BETWEEN: 1. SRI RAMESH S/O LATE NARAYANAGOWDA REPRESENTED BY HIS WIFE AND GUARDIAN, SMT. VARALAKSHMI, R/AT TAYAGARAJA MOHALLA, BANNUR TOWN, BANNUR HOBLI T. NARASIPURA TALUK MYSORE DISTRICT-571101 …PETITIONER (BY SRI. BHASKARA M., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. SMT SHANTHA W/O JAYARAM AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS R/AT NO.1927, 2ND CROSS, HEBBAL 1ST STAGE, MYSORE-570016 2. SMT. VANAJAKSHI W/O SURESH AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS R/AT 756, KAMATGERI, ESHWAR TEMPLE ROAD, MANDI MOHALLA, MYSORE-570001 Digitally signed by VINUTHA B S Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010540652026 NC: 2026:KHC:54843 WP No. 24457 of 2026 3. SMT LATHA W/O N.R.MOHAN DEAD BY LRS PRADEEP S/O N.R.MOHAN AGED ABOUT 27 YEARS 4. MADHAN S/O N.R.MOHAN AGED ABOUT 24 YEARS BOTH ARE R/AT NAGUVINAHALLI VILLAGE, SRIRANGAPATNA TALUK, MANDYA DISTRICT-571438 5. SMT. DAKSHAYANI W/O SRIKANTA AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS R/AT NO.159, BASAVESHWARA LAYOUT, BEML 3RD STAGE, RAJARAJESHWARI LAYOUT BANGALORE-98 6. SRI. NITHIN.S S/O SURESH.N AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS R/AT.NO 756, KAMATGERI, ESHWAR TEMPLE ROAD, MANDI MOHALLA, MYSORE-570001 …RESPONDENTS THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASHING THE ORDER DATED 22.6.2026, I.A. No.7, UNDER ORDER RULE 10(2) OF CPC IN FDR No.4/2016, ANNEXURE-G PASSED BY THE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, T.NARASIPURA, MYSURU DISTRICT, VIDE ANNEXURE-H. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: - 3 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010540652026 NC: 2026:KHC:54843 WP No. 24457 of 2026 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K. V. ARAVIND ORAL ORDER This writ petition is filed impugning the order dated 22.06.2026, whereby the application seeking impleadment of the beneficiary under the Will came to be allowed. 2. In the FDP proceedings, the impleading applicant claims a right in the joint family properties, which are the subject matter of the FDP, on the basis of the Will executed by his grandmother. The impleading applicant claims a right in the suit schedule properties on the basis of the said Will, which requires examination. The Trial Court was, therefore, justified in permitting the impleadment. No exceptional ground is made out warranting interference with the impugned order. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed. Sd/- (K. V. ARAVIND) JUDGE VBS List No.: 1 Sl No.: 34