- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:15656 WP No. 8626 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 17TH DAY OF MARCH, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH WRIT PETITION NO. 8626 OF 2026 (CS-RES) BETWEEN: SMT. NASEEMA W/O ABDUL AZEEZ, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, R/AT HALLINGERI HOUSE, KOKKADA VILLAGE AND POST, BELTHANGADY TALUK, DAKSHINA KANANDA DISTRICT - 574 198. &PETITIONER (BY SRI. S. RAJASHEKAR, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA DEPARTMENT OF CO-OPERATION, 1ST FLOOR, VIKASA SOUDHA, DR. B.R. AMBEDKAR VEEDHI, BENGALURU - 560 001, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY. 2. THE RECOVERY OFFICER FOR CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES D.K. DISTRICT CENTRAL CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD., HEAD OFFICE, KODIAL BAIL, MANGALURU, D.K. DISTRICT - 575 003. 3. THE SOUTH CANARA DISTRICT CENTRAL CO-OPERATIE BANK LTD., NO.1113, KOKKADA BRANCH, Digitally signed by CHAYA S A Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:15656 WP No. 8626 of 2026 APEKSHA COMPLEX, KOKKADA, MANGALORE, D.K. DISTRICT - 574 198, REP. BY ITS BRANCH MANAGER. &RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. YOGESH D. NAIK, AGA FOR R1 & R2) THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE AUCTION SALE NOTICE IN FORM NO.8 ISSUED UNDER RULE 38 (2) (d) OF THE KARNATAKA CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES RULES, 1960 DATED 11.02.2026 IN C.E.P. NO. 330/2023-24 IN DISPUTE NO.333/2022-23 AND THE SALE NOTICE IN FORM NO.9 IN C.E.P. NO.330/2023-24 IN DISPUTE NO.333/2022-23 DATED 11.02.2026 FIXING THE DATE OF AUCTION ON 24.03.2026 VIDE ANNEXURES-A AND B. THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH ORAL ORDER Having taken note of the submissions made by the learned counsel appearing for the parties. 2. The petitioner herein has challenged the Auction Sale Notice dated 11.02.2026 (Annexures - A & B) without there being challenging the award passed in Dispute - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:15656 WP No. 8626 of 2026 Nos.333/2022-23 and in that view of the matter, no interference is called for in this writ petition. 3. However, it is open for the petitioner to challenge the award passed by the respondents- Authorities in accordance with law. 4. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is disposed of. SD/- (E.S.INDIRESH) JUDGE KLV List No.: 1 Sl No.: 20