Page No.# 1/4 GAHC010051242026 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : I.A.(Civil)/933/2026 ON THE DEATH OF SHONGU BIBI HER LEGAL HEIRS ABDUL GAFUR AND ORS S/O- LATE NIMAR ALI R/O- CHANDIPUR PART-II P.O. KALIBARI P.S. ALGAPUR DIST.- HAILAKANDI ASSAM 2: LAILA BEGUM BARBHUIYA D/O- LATE NIMAR ALI R/O- CHANDIPUR PART-II P.O. KALIBARI P.S. ALGAPUR DIST.- HAILAKANDI ASSAM 3: HASNA BEGUM BARBHUIYA S/O- LATE NIMAR ALI R/O- CHANDIPUR PART-II P.O. KALIBARI P.S. ALGAPUR DIST.- HAILAKANDI ASSAM 4: MONOWARA BEGUM CHOUDHURY C/O SELIM UDDIN CHOUDHURY RESIDENT OF VILLAGE UTTAR KANCHANPUR PART II P O CHIPERSANGAN DIST HAILAKANDI ASSAM VERSUS Page No.# 2/4 ABDUL HOQUE BARBHUIYA AND ORS S/O- LATE MAYUB ALI R/O- CHANDIPUR PART-II P.S. ALGAPUR DIST.- HAILAKANDI ASSAM 2:ABDUL REJAK BARBHUIYA S/O- LATE MAYUB ALI R/O- CHANDIPUR PART-II P.S. ALGAPUR DIST.- HAILAKANDI ASSAM 3:ABDUL MOTIN BARBHUIYA S/O- LATE MAYUB ALI R/O- CHANDIPUR PART-II P.S. ALGAPUR DIST.- HAILAKANDI ASSAM 4:BAHAR UDDIN BARBHUIYA @ YASIN ALI S/O- LATE MAYUB ALI R/O- CHANDIPUR PART-II P.S. ALGAPUR DIST.- HAILAKANDI ASSAM 5:ABU KASHIM BARBHUIYA S/O- LATE MAYUB ALI R/O- CHANDIPUR PART-II P.S. ALGAPUR DIST.- HAILAKANDI ASSAM 6:SAMSUL HAQUE BARBHUIYA S/O- LATE MAYUB ALI R/O- CHANDIPUR PART-II P.S. ALGAPUR DIST.- HAILAKANDI ASSAM 7:FAKAR UDDIN BARBHUIYA S/O- LATE MAYUB ALI R/O- CHANDIPUR PART-II P.S. ALGAPUR DIST.- HAILAKANDI ASSAM Page No.# 3/4 8:BIBI AYESHA W/O- HAZI TAYUB ALI R/O- BAKRIHAWAR PART-VI P.S. PANCHGRAM DIST.- HAILAKANDI PIN- 788802. 9:ABDUL HASIB LASKAR SECRETARY JUKURGRAM MASJID R/O- VILL.- CHIPORSANGAN PART-II P.O. CHIPORSANGAN P.S. ALGAPUR DIST.- HAILAKANDI ASSAM PIN- 788801. ------------ Advocate for : MR H I CHOUDHURY Advocate for : MR. N H MAZARBHUIYAN appearing for ABDUL HOQUE BARBHUIYA AND ORS BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ROBIN PHUKAN ORDER 06.04.2026 Heard Mr. N. Haque, learned counsel for the applicants and Mr. R.R. Bhuyan, learned counsel for the opposite party. 2. This interlocutory application, under Order XXII Rule 9 of the CPC, is preferred by the applicant s for setting aside abatement of the connected RSA against the appellant No. 5. 3. Mr. Haque, learned counsel for the applicants submits that the connected interlocutory applications for condonation of delay and substitution of legal heirs have already been allowed by this Court and as such, the abatement of the RSA against the appellant No. 5 may be set aside. Page No.# 4/4 4. On the other hand, Mr. Bhuyan, learned counsel for the opposite party submits that he has no objection. 5. Having considered the submissions of learned counsel for both the parties and also considering the facts and circumstances on the record, abatement of the connected RSA against the appellant No. 5 stands set aside. 6. In terms of above, this IA stands disposed of. JUDGE Comparing Assistant