Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2026 DAILYLAW 4405 (RAJ)

ARCHANA SINHA D/O LATE DR. SIYARAM SAXENA v. PRASAR BHARTI

CW/6212/2026 · 2026-04-09

Ashok Kumar Jain, Inderjeet Singh

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:RJ-JP:14930-DB] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR D.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 6212/2026 Archana Sinha D/o Late Dr. Siyaram Saxena, Aged About 59 Years, Resident Of A/27, Flat No.101, Rajaveer Apartment, Shashtri Nagar, Jaipur-302016, Rajasthan. Presently Working On The Post Of Deputy Director, Programme, Aakashwani, Jaipur. (Group A Post). Subject Transfer ----Petitioner Versus 1. Prasar Bharti, Through Its Chief Executive Officer, Prasar Bharti Secretariat, C- Tower Mandi House, New Delhi- 110001. 2. The Director General, Aakashwani, Aakashwani Bhawan, Sansad Marg, New Delhi-110001. 3. Reshma Khan, Assistant Director, Programme, Prasar Akashwani, 5 Park House, M.i. Road, Jaipur-302005 ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Amit Mathur For Respondent(s) : Mr. Bharat Vyas, ASG, (Senior Advocate) with Mr. Sanjay Mishra HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE INDERJEET SINGH HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR JAIN Order 09/04/2026 1. By this writ petition the petitioner has challenged the order dated 24.03.2026 passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal as well as transfer order dated 21.04.2025 whereby the petitioner has been transferred from Jaipur to Delhi. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner after attaining the age of superannuation is going to [2026:RJ-JP:14930-DB] (2 of 2) [CW-6212/2026] retire on 31.07.2026. Learned counsel prayed for quashing of the transfer order dated 21.04.2025. 3. Learned ASG appearing for respondent(s) opposed the submissions made on behalf of the petitioner. 4. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the material placed on record. 5. Considering the facts and circumstances of the present case and also the fact that after attaining the age of superannuation the petitioner is going to retire on 31.07.2026, we deem it just and proper to quash the transfer order dated 21.04.2025 qua the present petitioner. 6. Accordingly, the writ petition is hereby allowed. 7. Misc. application, if any, stands disposed of. (ASHOK KUMAR JAIN),J (INDERJEET SINGH),J CHETNA/GAURAV/169