Date of reserved for orders : Date of pronouncement :02.07.2026 Date of uploading : APHC010631062017 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3329] THURSDAY, THE 2nd DAY OF JULY 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 3821/2017 Between: 1. KAKARLAPUDI SATYANARAYANA RAJU, S/O. LATE ANANTHA PADMANABHARAJU, AGED 65 YEARS, OCC: CULTIVATION, RIO. D.NO.3-57/2, SURANNA NAGAR VAKALAPUDI, KAKINADA - 533005. 2. KAKARLAPUDI VENKATA SUBBARAJU, S/O. LATE ANANTHA PADMANABHARAJU, AGED 48 YEARS, OCC: CULTIVATION, R/O. D.NO.70-14-11/A, JAYENDRA NAGAR KAKINADA - 533003. 3. KAKARLAPUDI NARAYANA RAJU, S/O. LATE ANANTHA PADMANABHARAJU, AGED 60 YEARS, OCC: CULTIVATION, R/O. D.NO.69-7-26/2, VEGULLA PAPAYYA STREET OPP: BOAT CLUB, KAKINADA - 533003. 4. DANTULURI RAMANAYAMNNA, W/O. VENKATA RAGHAVARAJU, AGED 67 YEARS, HOUSE WIFE, R/O. D.NO.3-18B-3/3, AYODHYA NAGAR KAKINADA - 533003. 5. DATLA VENKATAPATHI RAJU, S/O. TIRUPATHI RAJU, AGED 57 YEARS, R/O. F.NO.303, SSV VAIBHAV NGO COLONY, AYYAPPA NAGAR, VISAKHAPATNAM - 530007. 6. MANTHENA SURYANARAYANA RAJU, S/O. VENKATAPATHIRAJU, AGED 82 YEARS, OCC: CULTIVATION, R/O. SARABHAVARAM VILLAGE PRATIPADU MANDAL, E. G. DISTRICT. 7. VATSAVAYI VEERA VENKATA SATYANARAYANA VARMA, S/O. VENKATA NARASIMHA RAJU, AGED 67 YEARS, OCC: 2 CULTIVATION, RIO. KAKINADA. 8. DATLA SUBBARAJU, S/O. NARASIMHA RAJU, AGED 62 YEARS, OCC: CULTIVATION, R/O. NAMAVARIPALEM, PALLEPALEM POST KAZULURU MANDAL, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. MADDURI VENKATARATHNAM SINCE DEAD BY L RS, MADDURI VENKATARAMAN S/O. LATE VENKATARATHNAM, HINDU, AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS, D.NO. 8-4-21, ASHOK NAGAR, GAJUWAKA, VISAKHAPATNAM 2. MADDURI SRI KRISHNA PARAMATMA, S/O. LATE VENKATARATHNAM, HINDU, AGED 52 YEARS, D.NO. 3-17-50/4, KANAIAH KAPU NAGAR, KAKINADA. 3. AKULA ADILAKSHMI DIED, - 4. MADDURI TALLEMMA, W/O. LATE VENKATARATHNAM, HINDU, AGED 75 YEARS, D.NO. 3-17-50/4, KANAIAH KAPU NAGAR, KAKINADA. 5. SOMISETTI MADHAVI, W/O. KOTESWARARAO, HINDU, HOUSE WIFE, 36 YEARS, D.NO. 3-17-50/4, KANAIAH KAPU NAGAR, KAKINADA. 6. KUPPALA SURYAKUMARI, W/O. KANAKESWARARAO, HINDU, HOUSE WIFE, D.NO. 3-17-50/4, KANAIAH KAPU NAGAR, KAKINADA. 7. KOLA MEENAKSHI, W/O. VENKATARAMANA, HOUSE WIFE, 31 YEARS, D.NO. 3-17-50/4, KANAIAH KAPU NAGAR, KAKINADA. 8. AKULA SAYANARAYANA, S/O. NOT KNOWN, HINDU, AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS, BALABHADRAPURAM, BICCAVOLE MANDAL, ANAPARTHI JCJC 9. AKULA BHASKARARAO, S/O. SATYANARAYANA, HINDU, AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS, BALABHADRAPURAM, BICCAVOLE MANDAL, ANAPARTHI JOC 10. AKULA VENKATA RAMANA, S/O. SATYANARAYANA, HINDU, AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS, BALABHADRAPURAM, BICCAVOLE 3 MANDAL, ANAPARTHI JCJC 11. AKULA NARAYANA, S/O. SATYANARAYANA, HINDU, AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS, BALABHADRAPURAM, BICCAVOLE MANDAL, ANAPARTHI JCJC ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India,praying that in the circumstances stated in the grounds filed herein,the High Court may be pleased toagainst the Order dated 22.12.2016 on the file of the II Additional Senior Civil Judge, Kakinada passed in I.A.No.1154 of 2008 in 0.S.No.29/1987 IA NO: 1 OF 2017(CRPMP 5031 OF 2017 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to condone the delay of 98 days in representation of the above CRP and pass IA NO: 2 OF 2017(CRPMP 5032 OF 2017 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to expedite the hearing in the above CRP and pass Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. VENKAT CHALLA Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. V VINOD K REDDY 2. The Court made the following: 4 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 3821 of 2017 ORDER: When the matter is taken up for hearing, the docket order reveals that there is no representation on behalf of the petitioners on the last occasion i.e., on 24.06.2026. Therefore, on 24.06.2026, the matter is directed to be listed on 02.07.2026 under the caption ‘for dismissal’. Even though the matter is posted under the caption ‘for dismissal’, today also there is no representation for the petitioners. This shows that the petitioners are not evincing any interest in prosecuting the case. 2. Accordingly, the Civil Revision Petition is dismissed for non- prosecution. There shall be no order as to costs. Consequently, Miscellaneous Petitions, if any, pending in this Revision Petition shall stand closed. _________________________________ VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA, J 02.07.2026 BSP/TPS Whether the order is : Speaking Yes/No / Reasoned Yes/No Reportable Yes/No / Non-Reportable Yes/No 5 06 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO:3821/2017 02.07.2026 BSP/TPS