Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR
CNR: KAHC010602422024 NC: 2026:KHC:54591 RP No. 514 of 2024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 30TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R DEVDAS REVIEW PETITION NO. 514 OF 2024 BETWEEN:
1. SRI. RAJENDRA, S/O LATE LAKSHMIDEVI, AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS, R/A NO.3, 20TH CROSS, NEAR BAJANE MANE, EJIPURA, VIVEKANAGAR POST, BENGALURU - 560 047. 2. SMT. MUNITHAYAMMA, AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS, D/O LATE MUNIVENKATAPPA, R/AT NO.166, PANATHUR DINNE, BANGALORE EAST TALUK, BANGALORE - 560 087. …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. T.K.RAJAGOPALA, ADVOCATE) AND:
1. SRI. N.S.ANAND, S/O N.C.SUBBARAJU, AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS, R/AT NO.4027/144, 7TH CROSS, KANAKAPURA ROAD,
Digitally signed by JUANITA THEJESWINI Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
- 2 -
HC-KAR
CNR: KAHC010602422024 NC: 2026:KHC:54591 RP No. 514 of 2024
7TH BLOCK, JAYANAGAR, BENGALURU - 560 082. 2. SRI. N.S.NARENDRA, S/O N.C.SUBBARAJU, AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS, R/AT NO.4027/144, 7TH CROSS, KANAKAPURA ROAD, 7TH BLOCK, JAYANAGAR, BENGALURU - 560 011. 3. SRI. MUNIVENKATASWAMY, S/O LATE MUNIVENKATAPPA, AGED ABOUT 76 YEARS, R/AT VEERASANDRA VILLAGE, ATTIBELE HOBLI, ANEKAL TALUK, BENGALURU - 560 100. 4. SRI. M. KRISHNAPPA, S/O LATE MUNIVENKATAPPA, AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS, R/AT VEERASANDRA VILLAGE, ATTIBELE HOBLI, ANEKAL TALUK, BENGALURU - 560 100. 5. SRI. NAGARAJU, S/O KRISHNAPPA, AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS, R/AT VEERASANDRA VILLAGE, ATTIBELE HOBLI, ANEKAL TALUK, BENGALURU - 560 100. 6. SRI. MUNIRAJU, S/O KRISHNAPPA,
- 3 -
HC-KAR
CNR: KAHC010602422024 NC: 2026:KHC:54591 RP No. 514 of 2024
AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS, R/AT VEERASANDRA VILLAGE, ATTIBELE HOBLI, ANEKAL TALUK, BENGALURU - 560 100. 7. SRI. MUNISHAMAPPA, S/O LATE MUNIVENKATAPPA, AGED ABOUT 76 YEARS, R/AT VEERASANDRA VILLAGE, ATTIBELE HOBLI, ANEKAL TALUK, BENGALURU - 560 100. 8. SRI. KANAKAPPA, S/O LATE MUNIVENKATAPPA, AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS, R/AT VEERASANDRA VILLAGE, ATTIBELE HOBLI, ANEKAL TALUK, BENGALURU - 560 100. 9. SRI. K. MANJUNATH, S/O KANAKAPPA, AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS, R/AT VEERASANDRA VILLAGE, ATTIBELE HOBLI, ANEKAL TALUK, BENGALURU -560 100. 10. SRI. K. RAVI, S/O KANAKAPPA, AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS, R/AT VEERASANDRA VILLAGE, ATTIBELE HOBLI, ANEKAL TALUK, BENGALURU - 560 100. - 4 -
HC-KAR
CNR: KAHC010602422024 NC: 2026:KHC:54591 RP No. 514 of 2024
11. SRI. K. NAGARAJ, S/O KANAKAPPA, AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS, R/AT VEERASANDRA VILLAGE, ATTIBELE HOBLI, ANEKAL TALUK, BENGALURU - 560 100. 12. SRI. GOVINDAPPA, S/O LATE MUNIVENKATAPPA, AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS, R/AT VEERASANDRA VILALGE, ATTIBELE HOBLI, ANEKAL TALUK, BENGALURU - 560 100. 13. SRI.
G. BABU, S/O GOVINDAPPA, AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS, R/AT VEERASANDRA VILLAGE, ATTIBELE HOBLI, ANEKAL TALUK, BENGALURU - 560 100. 14. SRI. G. NANDISH, S/O GOVINDAPPA, AGED ABOUT 33 YEARS, R/AT VEERASANDRA VILLAGE, ATTIBELE HOBLI, ANEKAL TALUK, BENGALURU - 560 100. …RESPONDENTS (BY MS.PREETI KUMAR, ADVOCATE FOR SRI.ABHINAV R., ADVOCATE FOR R1 AND R2;
R2 REPRESENTED BY GPA HOLDER R1 (GPA COPY FURNISHED A/W VK);
SRI.G.V.P.DAS, ADVOCATE FOR R12-R14;
SRI.LINGAPPA B.T., ADVOCATE FOR R5;
R7 - MUNISHAMAPPA SERVED;
- 5 -
HC-KAR
CNR: KAHC010602422024 NC: 2026:KHC:54591 RP No. 514 of 2024
R8 - KANAKAPPA SERVED;
R9 - K.MANJUNATH SERVED;
R10- K RAVI SERVED)
THIS REVIEW PETITION IS FILED UNDER ORDER 47 RULE 1 OF CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE, 1908 PRAYING TO A.PASS AN ORDER REVIEWING THE ORDER DATED 18.09.2024 BY THIS HONBLE COURT IN W.P. NO.23099/2024 AT ANNEXURE-A AND TO ALLOW THE REVIEW PETITION AND TO SET ASIDE THE
ORDER PASSED IN W.P. NO.23099/2024.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY,
ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R DEVDAS
ORAL ORDER
Insofar as the note put up in the cause list is concerned, the attention of the office is directed to the order dated 28.11.2025, whereby this Court has already held that the review petition stands abated as against respondent Nos.3, 4 and 6.
2. Sri. Abhinav R., learned counsel has entered appearance for respondent Nos.1 and 2.
3. This review petition has been filed by respondent Nos.1 and 2 in the writ petition to review the
order dated 18.09.2024. However, this Court finds that
- 6 -
HC-KAR
CNR: KAHC010602422024 NC: 2026:KHC:54591 RP No. 514 of 2024
there are no tenable grounds raised by the petitioners to review the order passed by this Court. To a pointed question put to the learned counsel for the petitioners as to what is the error apparent on the face of the record which seeks a review of the order, the learned counsel for the petitioners has no answer.
4. Consequently, the review petition stands dismissed.
Sd/- (R DEVDAS) JUDGE
TMP List No.: 1 Sl No.: 20