[2026:RJ-JP:10799] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 17109/2025 Sanjay Agarwal S/o Shri Shyam Agarwal, R/o Royal Heights, B- 503, 5Th Floor, Charali Police Station, Dibrugarh, West Assam, Present Address Krishna Deep Apartments, First Floor, 1-C, Block B, A.K., Azad Road, Rehabadi, Gohati, Assam. (At Present Applicant Confined In Central Jail, Dehradun). ----Accused-Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Public Prosector ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. S.S. Hora For State For Complainant(s) : : Mr. Manvendra Singh Choudhary, PP Mr. Sangram Singh Solanki through VC HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SANGEETA SHARMA Order 13/03/2026 1. This bail application has been filed on behalf of the accused- petitioner under Section 483 of B.N.S.S. in connection with FIR No.264/2024 registered at Police Station Vigyan Nagar, District Kota City for the offence(s) under Sections 318(4), 316(2), 61(2) and 111 of BNS. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case. Learned counsel also submits that petitioner is behind the bars since 16.01.2025. Learned counsel further submits that there is no criminal antecedent against him. Learned counsel submits that co-accused Jagdish Singh and Vikas have been enlarged on bail by Co- ordinate Bench of this Court vide order dated 10.09.2025 in S.B. [2026:RJ-JP:10799] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-17109/2025] Criminal Misc. Bail Application No.10972/2025 and 12.08.2025 in S.B. Criminal Misc. Bail Application No.16304/2024 respectively and conclusion of trial will take time, so no fruitful purpose would be served by keeping the petitioner in custody and therefore, prays that the petitioner may be granted the benefit of bail under Section 483 of BNSS. 3. Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor and counsel for the complainant vehemently opposes the submissions made by learned counsel for the petitioner hereinabove and submits that petitioner is a mastermind of cyber fraud. 4. During the course of arguments, learned counsel for the complainant submits that complainant has lost Rs. 38 lac due to cyber fraud committed by the petitioner in an organized manner. Insofar as the co-accused Jagdish and Vikas are concerned, they have been enlarged on bail after depositing the money which was allegedly transferred from the account of complainant to their accounts and they have no criminal antecedents. Additionally, there are 37 complaints registered against the Bandhan Bank Account No.20100029272786 of the petitioner across the country on the 1930 portal. Petitioner has not returned a single penny to the complainant. 5. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the material available on record. 6. As mentioned above, complainant has lost Rs.38 lacs due to cyber fraud committed by the petitioner in an organized manner, this amount has been deposited in petitioner's Bandhan Bank Account No.20100029272786 and no single penny has been returned to the complainant and on this ground alone S.B. [2026:RJ-JP:10799] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-17109/2025] Criminal Misc. Bail Application No.14770/2024 submitted by the co-accused Shubham has already been dismissed by Co-ordinate Bench of this Court as withdrawn vide order dated 12.08.2025. It is pertinent to mention that as per factual report submitted by the learned Public Prosecutor it is revealed that 37 complaints of cyber fraud have been instituted against the above-mentioned Bandhan Bank Account No.20100029272786 of the petitioner across the country. Co-accused Jagdish Singh and Vikas have been enlarged on bail by Co-ordinate Bench of this Court vide order dated 10.09.2025 in S.B. Criminal Misc. Bail Application No.10972/2025 and 12.08.2025 in S.B. Criminal Misc. Bail Application No.16304/2024 respectively, after depositing the money which was allegedly transferred from the account of complainant to their account and there are no criminal antecedents against them. Therefore, the case of the present petitioner is not on the same footing. Hence, considering all the facts and circumstances this Court without expressing any opinion on the merits/demerits of the case does not deems it fit to enlarge the petitioner on bail. 7. Accordingly, the present Criminal Misc. Bail Application is dismissed. (SANGEETA SHARMA),J HEENA/17