Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 44019 (KAR)

N KOTTURAPPA S/O D.R. NAGANNA v. N GANGAMMA W/O D. NANJAPPA

RSA/220/2018 · 2026-09-29

S R Krishna Kumar

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010469132018 NC: 2026:KHC:53916 RSA No. 220 of 2018 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 29TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.R.KRISHNA KUMAR REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO. 220 OF 2018 (PAR) BETWEEN: N KOTTURAPPA S/O D.R. NAGANNA, R/O KENKER EGOLLARAHATTI, HAMLE OF KENKERE, HULIYAR HOBLI, CHIKKANAYAKANAHALLY TALUK TUMKUR DISTRICT - 572 214. …APPELLANT (BY SRI. K S RAMASWAMY IYENGAR AND SRI. B.T. RAGHAVENDRA, ADVOCATES) AND: 1. N GANGAMMA W/O D. NANJAPPA, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, R/AT DODDAMETIKURKE VILLAGE, KANAKATTE HOBI, ARASIKERE TALUK, HASSAN DISTRICT 573103. 2. D.R. NAGANA@ DASARAPPANA NAGANNA, S/O RUDRAPPA, AGED ABOUT 74 YEARS, R/AT KENKERE GOLLARAHTTI, HAMLET OF KENKERE, HULIYAR HOBLI, CHIKKANAYAKANAHALLI TALUK TUMKUR DISTRICT 572 214. 3. CHANNAMMA W/O D.R. NAGANNA, AGED ABOUT 69 YEARS, R/AT KENKERE GOLALRAHATTI, HAMLET OF KENKERE, HULIYAR HOBLI, CHIKKANAYAKANAHALLY TALUK TUMKUR DISTRICT - 572 214. …RESPONDENTS (VIDE ORDER DATED: 10.06.2024 APPEAL AGAINST R-1 IS DISMISSED VIDE ORDER DATED: 27.05.2024 SERVICE OF NOTICE TO R-2 & R-3 ARE H/S) Digitally signed by VANDANA S Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010469132018 NC: 2026:KHC:53916 RSA No. 220 of 2018 THIS RSA IS FILED UNDER ORDER 41 RULE 5 R/W SEC.151 OF CPC 1908 PRAYING TO PENDING THE DISPOSAL OF THE PRESENT APPEAL THE OPERATION OF THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE IN RA NO 38/2016 DATED 06.09.2017 IN SR.CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, CHIKKANAYAKANAHALLI. THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.R.KRISHNA KUMAR ORAL JUDGMENT Counsel for the appellant has filed a memo seeking to withdraw the appeal. Memo reads as under: “As per the instruction of the appellant the dispute between the parties are settled out of Court, hence the appeal may kindly be dismissed as withdrawn, in the interest of justice and equity.” Memo is placed on record. The Regular Second Appeal is dismissed as withdrawn. Sd/- (S.R.KRISHNA KUMAR) JUDGE BVV List No.: 1 Sl No.: 44