Research › Search › Judgment

Calcutta High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 44014 (CAL)

SK ALMAMUD ALI v. UNION OF INDIA AND ORS.

WPA/21995/2026 · 2026-09-29

Krishna Rao

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

S/L 214 29.09.2026 Court. No. 25 Sourav WPA 21995 of 2026 Sk Almamud Ali Vs. Union of India & Ors. Ms. Reshma Khatun … for the petitioner. Ms. Anamika Pandey … for E.C.I. Mr. Mukunda Lal Sarkar … for the State. 1. The grievance of the petitioner in the present writ application is that the petitioner has preferred an appeal before the Appellate Tribunal against the deletion of the name of the petitioner from the voter list. But the Appellate Tribunal without giving any notice of opportunity of hearing to the petitioner, excluded the name of the petitioner from the roll. 2. The petitioner prays for a direction upon the appellate Tribunal for restoration of the appeal and for giving an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner before passing any appropriate order. 3. Learned counsel appearing for the ECI submits that the Appellate Tribunal will give an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner and will pass appropriate order. 4. In view of the submission made by the learned counsel for the respective parties, the Appellate Tribunal is requested to restore the appeal of the petitioner and to dispose of the appeal after giving an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner within a period of three months from the date of receipt of this order. 2 5. WPA 21995 of 2026 is disposed of. 6. Urgent photostat certified copies of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties upon compliance with all the necessary formalities. (Krishna Rao, J.)