Research › Search › Judgment

Calcutta High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 44006 (CAL)

PROBIR KUMAR ROY v. STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS.

WPA/24771/2026 · 2026-09-25

Saugata Bhattacharyya

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

25.09.2026 20 Court No. 05 (DL) (Suvendu Mukherjee) IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Constitutional Writ Jurisdiction (APPELLATE SIDE) WPA 24771 of 2026 Probir Kumar Roy –Versus – The State of West Bengal & Ors. Mr. Suddhadev Adak Ms. Richa Pramanik …for the petitioner Mr. Amit Bikram Mahata Mr. S. Mondal Ms. Sneha Bag Ms. Sumana Ghosh …..for the respondent nos. 12 & 13 1. Affidavit of service filed on behalf of petitioner is taken on record. 2. By presenting this writ petition, prayer is made for directing concerned police authorities to take steps relating to property in question which would permit the petitioner to raise boundary wall in order to prevent trespassers. 3. Respondent nos. 12 and 13 are represented by learned advocate. However, in spite of service of notice State respondents are not represented. 4. It is submitted on behalf of respondent nos. 12 and 13 that issue involved in this writ petition is civil in nature which centers around immovable property. 2 5. Be that as it may, prayer is made in this writ petition for registration of FIR based on complaint lodged. If petitioner finds that concerned police authorities are not taking steps after receiving complaint, in that event petitioner shall be at liberty to approach jurisdictional Magistrate under Section 175(3) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. 6. However, concerned police authorities are directed to maintain peace and tranquility at the locale. 7. Writ petition stands disposed of. 8. Parties to act on server copy of this order duly downloaded from the official website of this Court. (Saugata Bhattacharyya, J.)