Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR
CNR: KAHC010589472022 NC: 2026:KHC:52925 WP No. 25866 of 2022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 24TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH WRIT PETITION NO. 25866 OF 2022 (KLR-RES) BETWEEN:
1.
SRI K M UMESH S/O K M MUNIVENAKTAPPA AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS R/AT KADENAHALLI VILLAGE BYRAKURU HOBLI, MULABAGILU TALUK KOLAR DISTIRCT, PIN - 563131
…PETITIONER (BY SRI. CHOWDAREDDY T. M, ADVOCATE) AND:
1.
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA RERPESENTED BY THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY REVENUE DEPARTMENT M S BUILDING BENGALURU - 560 001.
2.
THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER KOLAR SUB - DIVISION KOLAR - 563101.
3.
THE TAHSILDAR MULBAGAL TALUK MULABAGALU KOLAR DISRTRICT - 563131.
Digitally signed by CHAYA S A Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
- 2 -
HC-KAR
CNR: KAHC010589472022 NC: 2026:KHC:52925 WP No. 25866 of 2022
4.
THE COMMITTEE FOR REGULARIZATION OF UNAUTHORIZED OCCUPATION MULBAGAL TALUK MULBAGAL KOLAR DSITRICT PIN - 563131 RERPEENTED BY ITS CHAIRMAN
…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI SHAMANTH NAIK, AGA)
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE PROPOSAL DATED 15.11.2022 IN NO.LND/121/2022-23 SUBMITTED BY THE TAHSILDAR, MULBAGAL TALUK MULBAGAL, KOLAR DISTRICT, A COPY OF WHICH IS PRODUCED AT ANNEXURE -D SO FAR AS THE LAND IN THE UNAUTHORIZED OCCUPATION AND CULTIVATION BY THE PETITIONER, WHICH ARE DESCRIBED IN THE SCHEDULE HEREIN UNDER TO MEET THE ENDS OF JUSTICE AND ETC.,.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY,
ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH
ORAL ORDER
In this writ petition, the petitioner is assailing the
order dated 15.11.2022, produced at Annexure-D. However, the impugned order produced at Annexure-D is incomplete, and the same has not been rectified.
- 3 -
HC-KAR
CNR: KAHC010589472022 NC: 2026:KHC:52925 WP No. 25866 of 2022
In that view of the matter, as the writ petition has been pending consideration for nearly four years, I am of the view that the writ petition requires to be dismissed.
Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed.
SD/- (E.S.INDIRESH) JUDGE
BKM List No.: 1 Sl No.: 3