JAGMOHAN S/O LT. SH. RAMBHAROSI v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CRLMB/3110/2026 · 2026-03-18
Ravi Chirania
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 4399 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 4399 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2026:RJ-JP:11668] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 3110/2026
1. Jagmohan S/o Lt. Sh. Rambharosi, Aged About 40 Years, R/o Shehrakar, Police Station Todabhim, District Karauli (Raj.)
2. Ramsingh S/o Lt. Sh. Rambharosi, Aged About 41 Years, R/o Shehrakar, Police Station Todabhim, District Karauli (Raj.) ----Petitioners Versus State of Rajasthan, through P.P. ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Arvind Balaut For Respondent(s) : Ms. Manju Dave, P.P.
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI CHIRANIA
Order 18/03/2026
1. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the material available on record.
2. The anticipatory bail application has been preferred by the accused- petitioners Jagmohan S/o Lt. Sh. Rambharosi and Ramsingh S/o Lt. Sh. Rambharosi, under Section 482 of B.N.S.S., who are real brothers of the complainant herein apprehending their arrest in connection with the FIR bearing No.389/2025 dated 01.11.2025 in respect of the incident dated 09.10.2025, registered at Police Station Todabhim, District Karauli for the offence punishable under Sections 329(3) and 303(2) of B.N.S.
3.
Learned counsel submitted that the accused-petitioners have falsely been implicated in the present case. Learned counsel
[2026:RJ-JP:11668] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-3110/2026] further submitted that the allegations against the petitioner are that he has cut a babool tree from the undivided agricultural land and has further forcibly sown a mustard crop on the portion of land belonging to the complainant. Learned counsel further submitted that the land is still undivided as on date and both the parties are real brothers, and there are no criminal antecedents of any nature against the petitioners. In view thereof, learned counsel for the petitioner prayed that the accused-petitioners being innocent persons, may be enlarged on anticipatory bail.
4. Learned Public Prosecutor opposed the bail application.
5. Considering the overall peculiar facts and circumstances of the case, this Court has considered the nature of the allegations as mentioned in the FIR and the relationship between the parties. It is further noted that the entire land is an undivided agricultural land of the brothers. The dispute appears to be civil in nature, this Court is inclined to exercise its powers under Section 482 of the BNSS and deems it just and proper to grant anticipatory bail to the accused–petitioners.
6. Accordingly, the anticipatory bail application under Section 482 B.N.S.S. filed by the accused- petitioners under Section 482 BNSS are allowed and it is directed that in the event of arrest of accused-petitioners - Jagmohan S/o Lt. Sh. Rambharosi and Ramsingh S/o Lt. Sh. Rambharosi in connection with the FIR bearing No.389/2025, registered at Police Station Todabhim, District Karauli, they shall be enlarged on bail provided each of them furnish a personal bond in a sum of Rs.1,00,000/- with two sound and solvent sureties of Rs.50,000/- each to the satisfaction of concerned I.O./S.H.O. on the following conditions:-
[2026:RJ-JP:11668] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-3110/2026] (i) they shall make themselves available for interrogation by Investigating Officer as and when required; (ii) they shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade them from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any Police Officer; (iii) they shall not leave India without the previous permission of the court.
(RAVI CHIRANIA),J 93 - RAVI KHANDELWAL