Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 4398 (KAR)

CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION v. M/S. ARB TRADING INC.,

CRL.RP/168/2019 · 2026-04-16

V Srishananda

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:20863 CRL.RP No. 168 of 2019 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 16TH DAY OF APRIL, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION No.168 OF 2019 (397(Cr.PC) / 438(BNSS) BETWEEN: CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION (ANTI-CORRUPTION BRANCH), NO.36, BELLARY ROAD, GANGANAGAR, BANGALORE-560 032, REPRESENTED BY INSPECTOR OF POLICE. &PETITIONER (BY SRI. PRASANNA KUMAR P, ADVOCATE -ABSENT) AND: 1. M/S. ARB TRADING INC., 1ST CROSS, TARIKERE ROAD, SADATH COLONY, NEHRUNAGAR, BHADRAVATHI, SHIMOGA DISTRICT-577 201. 2. SRI. RAHAT @ RAHAT HASSAN S/O. ABDUL RASHEED, PROPRIETOR, M/S. ABB TRADING INC., 1ST CROSS, TARIKERE ROAD, SADATH COLONY, NEHRUNAGAR, BHADRAVATHI, SHIMOGA DISTRICT-577 201. &RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. RAVINDRA B DESHPANDE, ADVOCATE) THIS CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION IS FILED UNDER SECTION 397 R/W 401 CODE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE Digitally signed by R MANJUNATHA Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:20863 CRL.RP No. 168 of 2019 PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THAT PART OF THE ORDER DATED 28.04.2018, PASSED BY THE LEARNED XXXII ADDITIONAL CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE AND SPECIAL JUDGE FOR CBI CASES AT BANGALORE (CCH-34) IN SPECIAL C.C. NO.381/2015 THEREBY ALLOWING THE APPLICATION FILED BY THE RESPONDENTS HEREIN/ACCUSED NOs.8 AND 9 UNDER SECTION 239 OF CODE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE, AND DISCHARGING THE ACCUSED NOs.8 AND 9 FROM THE ABOVE CASE, AND CONSEQUENTLY ALLOW THE RP. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA ORAL ORDER None present on behalf of the revision petitioner. Learned counsel for the respondent is present. 2. On the previous date, matter was adjourned at the request of the learned counsel for the revision petitioner. 3. Accordingly, revision petition is dismissed for non prosecution. SD/- (V SRISHANANDA) JUDGE kcm List No.: 2 Sl No.: 67