Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 4392 (AP)

MALLAVARAPU ANJI REDDY v. THE STATE OF AP

WP/6969/2026 · 2026-07-01

Harinath N

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Date of reserved for orders : Date of pronouncement : 02.07.2026 Date of uploading : 08.07.2026 APHC010126592026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3457] THURSDAY, THE 2nd DAY OF JULY 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 6969/2026 Between: 1. MALLAVARAPU ANJI REDDY, S/O. RAMIREDDY, AGED ABOUT 68 YEARS, R/O. 37-1-413/38, RAM NAGAR 6TH LINE, ONGOLE PRAKASAM DISTRICT - 523001. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF AP, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, MUNICIPAL ADMINISTRATION DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 522238 2. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE AND PLANNING, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRICT.522238 3. THE COMMISSIONER AND DIRECTOR, MUNICIPAL ADMINISTRATION DEPARTMENT, PRIME HILL CREST, NEAR DGP OFFICE, BEHIND ULTRA TECH READYMIX PLANT, VADDESWARAM, MANGALAGIRI, GUNTUR DISTRICT.522302 4. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR AND MAGISTRATE, PRAKASAM DISTRICT, ONGOLE.523001 2 5. THE ONGOLE MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, REP. BY ITS COMMISSIONER, ONGOLE, PRAKASAM DISTRICT.523001 6. THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, ONGOLE MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, ONGOLE, PRAKASAM DISTRICT.523001 7. THE PAY AND ACCOUNTS OFFICER, WORKS AND ACCOUNTS, ONGOLE, PRAKASAM DISTRICT.523001 ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ or Order or direction, more particularly one in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS, declaring the action of the respondents in non payment of bills payable to the petitioner to a tune of Rs. 1,97,02,795/- (Rupees One Crore Ninety-Seven Lakhs Two Thousand Seven Hundred and Ninety-Five Only)(Gross Amount) for the work done pertaining to Replacement of 600 mm and 500 mm PSC Pipeline with D.l. K 7 pipe line for clear water gravity main from Housing Board Colony to Trunk Road along Bhagyanagar 4th Line in Ongole Municipal Corporation with Estimate cost Rs. 200.00 Lakhs as illegal, arbitrary, unreasonable and against the Articles 14 and 21 of the Constitution of India, 1949 and consequently direct the respondents to pay the bill amount of Rs. 1,97,02,795/- (Rupees One Crore Ninety-Seven Lakhs Two Thousand Seven Hundred and Ninety-Five Only) (Gross Amount), for the work executed by the petitioner and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2026 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents to consider the representation of the petitioner, dated 23/01/2026, and to release the withholding bill amount payable to the petitioner to a tune of Rs. 1,97,02,795/- [Rupees One Crore Ninety-Seven Lakhs Two Thousand Seven Hundred and Ninety-Five Only] (Gross Amount), pending disposal of the writ petition and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. BANDLA PAVAN Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR REVENUE 3 2. GP MUNCIPAL ADMN AND URBAN DEV AP 3. GP FOR FINANCE PLANNING The Court made the following: 4 ORDER:- The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner was entrusted with the work of Replacement of 600 mm and 500 mm PSC Pipeline with D.I. K-7 Pipeline for Clear Water Gravity Main from Housing Board Colony to Trunk Road along Bhagyanagar 4th Line in Ongole Municipal Corporation. 2. It is submitted that the petitioner had completed the work entrusted to him and that the competent authority of the respondents had also approved the payment due and payable to the petitioner. The cheque slip was also prepared for release of the payment. The respondents have also recorded the progress of the work and the amounts due and payable to the petitioner in the M-Book. 3. This matter was listed on 12.03.2026, and the learned Standing Counsel appearing for the respondents sought time to obtain written instructions. 4. Today, when the matter is listed, the learned Standing Counsel appearing for the respondents submits that no further instructions have been received. The completion of the work is not disputed, but it is submitted that the petitioner is claiming an amount of Rs.1,97,02,795/- towards the work executed. The cheque slip issued by the competent Engineer of the respondent Municipal Corporation would note that the work was completed in 5 all respects and that the pre-audit had also approved the final bill on 06.01.2026. 5. Recording the submissions, this writ petition is disposed of at the admission stage, the respondents are hereby directed to verify and release the payments due and payable to the petitioner as expeditiously as possible preferably within a period of twelve (12) weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. There shall be no order as to costs. 6. Pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. ____________________ JUSTICE HARINATH.N 02.07.2026. PNS Whether the order is: Speaking Reasoned ☑ Reportable Non-reportable ☑