24.09.2026 Court No.35. D/L.588. Rakib (Rejected) CRM (A) 3041 of 2026 In Re: An Application for Anticipatory Bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 in connection with Pandua Police Station case no. 117 of 2026 dated 20.02.2026 under Sections and under Sections 329(3)/115(2)/117(2)/89/76/324(3)/351(2)/352/3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. And In the matter of : Anil Bauldas ……Petitioner. Mr. Shibaji Kr. Das Ms. Deblina De .....for the Petitioner. Mr. Ranjan Chakraborti Mr. Abhijit Singh ……for the State. Learned advocate appearing for the petitioner submits that the only change in circumstances that rest of the accused persons have been granted anticipatory bail and it is only the petitioner who has not granted the relief. Learned advocate appearing for the State points out earlier the same was considered by the Coordinate Bench in CRM (A) 1157 of 2026. Three of the accused persons including the petitioner’s anticipatory bail was rejected. Having considered the submissions of the petitioner, I am of the opinion that there is no change of circumstance. Accordingly, the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner in CRM (A) 3041 of 2026 is dismissed. 2 All parties shall act in terms of server copy of the order downloaded from the official website of this Court. Urgent photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties upon compliance with all requisite formalities. (Tirthankar Ghosh, J.)