Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 43888 (MAD)

Vijayasanthi v. The Superintendent of Police, Kanniyakumari District

WP Crl.(MD)/3398/2026 · 2026-06-24

L Victoria Gowri

Transfer Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

WP CRL.(MD). No.3398 of 2026 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT Dated : 24/06/2026 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE L. VICTORIA GOWRI WP CRL.(MD). No.3398 of 2026 Vijayasanthi ... Petitioner Vs 1. The Superintendent of Police, Kanniyakumari District, Kanyakumari. 2. The Inspector of Police, Marthandam, Kanyakumari District. 3. The Principal, Immanuel Arasan Naturapathy and Yoga Medical College and Hospital, Edavilagam, Nattalam, Marthadam, Kanyakumari District. ... Respondents PRAYER :- To issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents no`s. 1 and 2 to take necessary steps to receive the documents (transfer certificate, original mark statement from 10th standard to 12th standard) from the respondent no.3 and hand over the same to the petitioner, without any delay in view of representation dated 09.02.2026, within the stipulated time. 1/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP CRL.(MD). No.3398 of 2026 For Petitioner : Mr. M.Jothi Basu, Advocate. For Respondent : Mr.D.Rajaboopathy Government Advocate (Crl.Side) ORDER This Writ Petition is filed seeking to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents nos. 1 and 2 to take necessary steps to receive the documents (transfer certificate, original mark statement from 10th standard to 12th standard) from the respondent no.3 and hand over the same to the petitioner, without any delay in view of representation dated 09.02.2026, within the stipulated time. 2. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner had sent a representation seeking to receive the documents from the third respondent. However, no proper action was taken, and therefore, this petition was filed. 2/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP CRL.(MD). No.3398 of 2026 3. Heard the learned counsel on either side and carefully perused the materials before this Court. Since no adverse order is proposed to be passed against the third respondent, notice to him is dispensed with. 4. Considering the facts and circumstances of this case, the second respondent police is directed to consider the petitioner's representation dated 09.02.2026 and conduct an enquiry in this regard, after issuing summons to the parties concerned, under Section 64 of the BNSS, and conclude the same, within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. 5. This writ petition is disposed with the above directions. 24.06.2026 NCC : yes / no Index : yes / no pnn 3/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP CRL.(MD). No.3398 of 2026 L. VICTORIA GOWRI,J pnn To 1. The Superintendent of Police, Kanniyakumari District, Kanyakumari. 2. The Inspector of Police, Marthandam, Kanyakumari District. 3. The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai. ORDER IN WP CRL.(MD) No.3398 of 2026 Date : 24/06/2026 4/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis