W.P.(MD) No.17227 of 2026 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 25.06.2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY W.P.(MD)No.17227 of 2026 C.Kathiresan ... Petitioner Vs. 1.The District Registrar (Administration), Collectorate Campus, Palayamkottai, Kokkirakulam, Tirunelveli - 627 009. 2.The Sub-Registrar, Radhapuram Sub-Registrar Office, Radhapuram, Tirunelveli District. ... Respondents Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, for issuance of a Writ of Certioarified Mandamus, calling for the records pertaining to the impugned check slip issued by the second respondent in RFL/Radhapuram/33/2026 dated 08.05.2026 and quash the same as arbitrary, illegal and consequently, directing the second respondent to register the Sale Deed presented in Reference No.TP/271526035/2026 dated 08.05.2026 in respect of the property bearing Re-Survey No. 399/1B3, Hectare 0.17.30 (16.75 Cents), situated at Koodankulam Village, Radhapuram Taluk, Tirunelveli District. For Petitioner : Mr.P.Saravanakumar _____________ Page No. 1 of 4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.(MD) No.17227 of 2026 For Respondents : Mr.P.Rajagopalan Government Standing Counsel ORDER This Writ Petition challenges the impugned refusal check slip, whereby the document presented by the petitioner for registration was refused on the ground that the original parent document, referred to and relied upon in the instrument presented for registration, had not been produced and that no non-traceable certificate had been furnished. 2. The said refusal is founded upon Section 34-C of the Registration Act, 1908, as inserted by Tamil Nadu Act 1 of 2026. 3. By order dated 23.06.2026 in M/s.Dugars, represented by its Partner v. State of Tamil Nadu and Others [W.P.(MD) No.7415 of 2026 etc., batch], Section 34-C of the Registration Act, 1908, has already been declared unconstitutional. 4. In view of the aforesaid judgment, the legal position that prevailed prior to the insertion of Section 34-C would govern the present case. Consequently, the production of a certified copy of the parent _____________ Page No. 2 of 4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.(MD) No.17227 of 2026 document would suffice for the purpose of registration and the registering authority is bound to consider the same in accordance with law. 5. Accordingly, this Writ Petition is allowed on the following terms: (i) The impugned refusal check slip is set aside. The petitioner is permitted to re-present the document for registration along with a certified copy of the parent document. Upon such presentation, the registering authority shall process the document and complete the registration, if it is otherwise in order and if there exists no other legal impediment. (ii) There shall be no order as to costs. NCC : No 25.06.2026 smn2 To 1.The District Registrar (Administration), Collectorate Campus, Palayamkottai, Kokkirakulam, Tirunelveli - 627 009. 2.The Sub-Registrar, Radhapuram Sub-Registrar Office, Radhapuram, Tirunelveli District. _____________ Page No. 3 of 4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.(MD) No.17227 of 2026 D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY , J. smn2 W.P.(MD) No.17227 of 2026 25.06.2026 _____________ Page No. 4 of 4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis