1 2026:CGHC:16786 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 3243 of 2021  G.P. Tiwari S/o Vishnu Prasad Tiwari, Aged About 65 Years R/o Friends Colony, Telikot, Kharsia, District - Raigarh Chhattisgarh. ... Petitioner versus 1. State Of Chhattisgarh, Through The Secretary, School Education Department, Mantralaya, Atal Nagar, Nava Raipur Chhattisgarh. 2. The Accountant General, Government Of Chhattisgarh, Balodabazar Road, Raipur Chhattisgarh. 3. The Block Education Officer, Block Kharsia, District - Raigarh Chhattisgarh. 4. The Senior Accounts Officer, Office Of Accountant General (Accounts And Pension), Zero Point, Balodabazar Road, Raipur, District - Raipur Chhattisgarh. 5. The Pension Adjudication Committee, General Administration Department, Government Of Chhattisgarh, Mahanadi Bhawan, Nawa Raipur, Atal Nagar, District - Raipur Chhattisgarh Through Its Chairman ... Respondent(s) For Petitioner : Mr. K.P. Sahu, Advocate For Respondents No. 2 & 4 : Mr. Raj Kumar Gupta, Advocate For State : Mr. Abhyuday Tripathi, Panel Lawyer Hon'ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan Pandey Order on Board 13.04 .2026 1. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the respondent authorities have not made payment of entire amount of General Provident Fund (GPF). He would submit that the petitioner is still entitled to receive Rs. 6,31,351/-. He would submit that a representation was made and same has been rejected. SIDDHANT TAMRAKAR Digitally signed by SIDDHANT TAMRAKAR Date: 2026.04.13 14:09:42 +0530 2 2. On the other hand, learned counsel appearing for respondents would oppose. Mr. Raj Kumar Gupta, Advocate appearing for the office of Accountant General would submit that after due verification, decision has been taken by Pension Redressal Committee. It is also contended that the petitioner was afforded sufficient opportunity at the time of hearing. 3. Heard. 4. Taking into consideration the dispute involved in this writ petition, in my opinion, writ petition is not maintainable. 5. At this stage, Mr. K.P. Sahu seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this petition with liberty to prefer duly constituted Civil Suit claiming therein sum of Rs. 6,31,351/- with interest from the respondents. 6. Permission granted. 7. Accordingly, this petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty. The petitioner would be at liberty to prefer duly constituted Civil Suit claiming therein sum of Rs. 6,31,351/- with interest. Sd/- (Rakesh Mohan Pandey) JUDGE $iddhant