IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.86553 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-31 Year-2025 Thana- MADHEPURA District- Madhepura ====================================================== 1. Muliya Devi @ Phuliya Devi W/o Ramchandra Mukhiya R/o Village - Madanpur Goriyari, Ward No. 01, P.S - Bharrahi, District - Madhepura 2. Rinku Devi W/o Nandan Mukhiya @ Nandan Mukhia R/o Village - Madanpur Goriyari, Ward No. 01, P.S - Bharrahi, District - Madhepura 3. Ramchandra Mukhiya S/o Late Jhakash Mukhiya R/o Village - Madanpur Goriyari, Ward No. 01, P.S - Bharrahi, District - Madhepura 4. Babloo Mukhiya S/o Ramchandra Mukhiya R/o Village - Madanpur Goriyari, Ward No. 01, P.S - Bharrahi, District - Madhepura 5. Roshan Kumar S/o Nandan Mukhia @ Nandan Mukhiya R/o Village - Madanpur Goriyari, Ward No. 01, P.S - Bharrahi, District - Madhepura 6. Ritesh Mukhia S/o Nandan Mukhia @ Nandan Mukhiya R/o Village - Madanpur Goriyari, Ward No. 01, P.S - Bharrahi, District - Madhepura ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Sama Akhtar For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Kumar Veerendra Narayan ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 3 22-01-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned A.P.P. for the State. 2. The petitioners apprehend their arrest in a case registered for the offence under Sections 115(2), 126(2), 76, 308(2), 303(2), 351(2), 352, 3(5) of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that petitioners are family members of co-accused Nandan Mukhiya, against whom there is allegation of committing rape upon informant. So far as these petitioners are concerned, they are Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.86553 of 2025(3) dt.22-01-2026 2/2 only alleged to have committed simple maarpit with informant. Rest of the allegation is ornamental. There is delay of four days in lodging the F.I.R. and there is no plausible explanation of delay. Petitioners claim clean antecedent. 4. Learned A.P.P. for the State has opposed the bail petition. 5. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, let the above named petitioners, in the event of their arrest/surrender within a period of eight weeks from today, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned C.J.M., Madhepura in connection with Madhepura P.S. Case No. 31 of 2025, subject to condition as laid down under Section 482 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. anay (Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) U T