Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR
CNR: KAHC010417662025 NC: 2026:KHC:52920 WP No. 19993 of 2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 24TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH WRIT PETITION NO. 19993 OF 2025 (KLR-RES) BETWEEN:
1.
SRI MANJUNATH SHETTY S/O.LATE.ANTHAMMA SHEDTHI AGE ABOUT 75 YEARS, RESIDING AT MADADADI MANE, NAGASHREE NILAYA, KALTHODU OST AND VILLAGE, BYNDOOR TALUK BENGALURU UDUPI DISTRICT-576262.
…PETITIONER (BY SRI. SHARATH KUMAR SHETTY.,ADVOCATE) AND:
1.
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, VIDHANASOUDHA, BANGALORE-560 001.
2.
THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, UDUPI DISTRICT, UDUPI-574118.
Digitally signed by CHAYA S A Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
- 2 -
HC-KAR
CNR: KAHC010417662025 NC: 2026:KHC:52920 WP No. 19993 of 2025
3.
THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER KUNDAPURA TALUK, UDUPI DISTRICT-576201.
4.
THE TAHSILDAR, KUNDAPUR TALUK, UDUPI DISTRICT-576201.
5.
THE REVENUE INSPECTOR, VANDSE HOBLI, KUNDAPUR TALUK, UDUPI DISTRICT-576201.
6.
SRI.MAHABALA SHETTY, S/O.LATE.ANANTHAMMA SHEDTHI AGE ABOUT 80 YEARS, R/AT.GUDDIMANE, KALTHODU POST AND VILLAGE, BYNDOOR TALUK, UDUPI DISTRICT-576262.
7.
SRI.RAGHURAM SHETTY, S/O.LATE ANANTHAMMA SHEDTHI, RESIDING AT HADIMANE, HOSADU VILLAGE, KUNDAPURA TALUK, UDUPI DISTRICT-576201.
…RESPONDENTS (BY SRI ADITYA DIWAKARA, AGA, FOR R1 TO R5)
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO CALL FOR RECORDS IN RAP/SR.NO.59/2024 ON THE FILE OF THE RESPONDENT NO.2 AND ETC.,.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY,
ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
- 3 -
HC-KAR
CNR: KAHC010417662025 NC: 2026:KHC:52920 WP No. 19993 of 2025
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH
ORAL ORDER
Learned Additional Government Advocate accepts notice for respondents No.1 to 5.
2. The petitioner in this writ petition is assailing the order dated 19.12.2019 (Annexure-M) passed by respondent No.4 and order dated 21.11.2023 (Annexure- N) passed by respondent No.3.
3. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the parties.
4. Taking into account that, the petitioner is claiming right over the land in question on the basis of the settlement deed dated 13.04.1989, said to have been executed by the mother of the petitioner in favour of the petitioner as well as his brothers, respondent Nos.6 and 7, the mutation has been made accordingly.
- 4 -
HC-KAR
CNR: KAHC010417662025 NC: 2026:KHC:52920 WP No. 19993 of 2025
5. In the event, if the petitioner is having any grievance as to the extent of the land as per settlement deed dated 14.10.1981 is concerned, it is open for the petitioner to establish his right over the land in question in a manner know to law. In that view of the matter, no interference is called for.
Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed.
SD/- (E.S.INDIRESH) JUDGE
BKM List No.: 1 Sl No.: 19