NAVIN MUNDOTIYA S/O SH. BABLU v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CRLMB/1616/2026 · 2026-03-06
Pramil Kumar Mathur
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 4385 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 4385 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2026:RJ-JP:9608] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 1616/2026 Navin Mundotiya S/o Sh. Bablu, Aged About 23 Years, R/o Amba Colony Boraj, Police Thana Ganj, District Ajmer. (Raj.). (At Present Confined In Central Jail Ajmer). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Anirudh Tyagi with Mr. Saurabh Vaishnav For Respondent(s) : Mr. Manvendra Singh Shekhawat, PP Mr. Nirmal Kumar Nagar HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR
Order 06/03/2026
1. The petitioner has preferred this bail application under Section 483 of BNSS in FIR No.229/2025 registered at Police Station Ganj, District Ajmer for offences under Sections 115(2), 126(2) and 3(5) of BNS, 2023.
2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Public Prosecutor as well as learned counsel for the complainant and perused the material available on record.
3.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. He again submits that the allegation levelled against the petitioner pertains to life- threatening injuries inflicted upon the injured Shubham. He contends that according to Shubham's statement recorded under Section 180 of the BNSS, the alleged life-threatening injury was
[2026:RJ-JP:9608] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-1616/2026] actually attributed to the co-accused, Ajay, who was granted benefit of bail by the Co-ordinate Bench of this Court on
06.01.2026. The case of the petitioner is on better footing. Petitioner is behind the bars since 01.10.2025 without any criminal past. The trial of the case will take considerable time, therefore, no fruitful purpose would be served by keeping the petitioner in further custody and on the ground of parity with other co-accused, the bail application deserves to be allowed.
4. Learned Public Prosecutor and learned counsel for the complainant have vehemently opposed the bail application.
5. On consideration of the rival submissions and material available on record and in light of submission made by learned counsel for the petitioner but without expressing any opinion on merits/demerits of the case, I am inclined to grant benefit of bail to the petitioners.
6. Consequently, the bail application under Section 483 B.N.S.S. is allowed and it is directed that the petitioner Navin Mundotiya S/o Sh. Bablu, be released on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court on all subsequent dates of hearing till conclusion of the trial.
(PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR),J Chandan/43