Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 43831 (KAR)

SRI. RANGANATH SHIVARAM v. SMT. RADHIKA PATIL

CCC/676/2024 · 2026-09-29

D K Singh, H Shanthi Bhushan

Contempt Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010371402024 NC: 2026:KHC:54133-DB CCC No. 676 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 29TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D K SINGH AND THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.SHANTHI BHUSHAN CIVIL CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 676 OF 2024 BETWEEN: SRI. RANGANATH SHIVARAM S/O SHIVARAM H, AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS, R/AT NO.526, 19TH CROSS, 26TH CROSS, KIRLOSKAR LAYOUT, SIDEDAHALLI, BANGALORE NORTH, PO NAGASANDRA, BANGALORE NORTH DISTRICT, BANGALORE-560 073. MOB 9535041234, EMAIL ranganathec@gmail.com …COMPLAINANT (BY SMT. SOFIYA, ADVOCATE) AND: SMT. RADHIKA PATIL D/O MARUTHIGOUDA PATIL, W/O SRI RANGANATH SHIVARAM, AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS, GIRNAR PRIDE APARTMENT, FLAT NO.D-4, 3RD FLOOR, SHIVABASAV NAGAR, BELGAVI-590 010. MOB 7204816506 EMAIL radhikapatil1994@gmail.com …ACCUSED (BY SRI. BHANU PRAKASH H.V.,ADVOCATE) THIS CCC IS FILED UNDER SECTIONS 10 AND 12 OF THE CONTEMPT OF COURTS ACT, R/W ARTICLE 215 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO INITIATE CONTEMPT OF COURT PROCEEDINGS AGAINST THE ACCUSED FOR Digitally signed by MALA K N Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010371402024 NC: 2026:KHC:54133-DB CCC No. 676 of 2024 WILLFUL DISOBEDIENCE OF THE ORDER OF THE HON’BLE III ADDITIONAL PRINCIPAL JUDGE, FAMILY COURT, BANGALORE DATED 15.04.2024 IN M.C.NO.2279/2024 VIDE ANNEXURE - A. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR HEAR BEFORE CHARGE, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D K SINGH AND HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.SHANTHI BHUSHAN ORAL ORDER (PER: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D K SINGH) The present contempt petition has been filed by the husband/complainant alleging second marriage by the wife when the interim order restraining the parties to contract second marriage was in force. In such a situation, no contempt lies. However, if ultimately the complainant succeeds, the second marriage of the wife would be null and void. Therefore, the contempt petition dismissed. The contempt notice stands discharged. Sd/- (D K SINGH) JUDGE Sd/- (H.SHANTHI BHUSHAN) JUDGE KNM/List No.: 1 Sl No.: 28