[2026:RJ-JP:9737] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 3614/2026 Ummar Mohammad S/o Fateh Mohammad, Aged About 32 Years, R/o Thek Ka Bas Police Station Pahari, District Deeg. (Raj.) (At Present Confined In Sub Jail Deeg). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Jaipur ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Sanjay Khan For Respondent(s) : Mr. Manvendra Singh Shekhawat, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR Order 06/03/2026 1. The petitioner has preferred this bail application under Section 483 of BNSS in FIR No.55/2025 registered at Police Station Pahari, District Deeg for offences under Sections 319(2), 318(4), 338, 336(3), 308(2), 61(2)(b) of BNS, 2023 and Section 66D of IT Act, 2008. 2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Public Prosecutor and perused the material available on record. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. He again submits that in the present matter, co-accused Akib, Sahil, Sajid, Munshed, Jahul, Mursalim, Nayab, Abdul and Talim have been enlarged on bail by Co-ordinate Bench of this Court vide order dated 06.06.2025 and other co-accused Noor Mohammad was released by the trial Court vide order dated 24.02.2026. The case of the petitioner is akin to [2026:RJ-JP:9737] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-3614/2026] them. Petitioner is behind the bars since 01.02.2026 with two cases reported as criminal antecedents. The trial of the case will take considerable time, therefore, no fruitful purpose would be served by keeping the petitioner in further custody and on the ground of parity with other co-accused, the bail application deserves to be allowed. 4. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail application. 5. On consideration of the rival submissions and material available on record and in light of submission made by learned counsel for the petitioner but without expressing any opinion on merits/demerits of the case, I am inclined to grant benefit of bail to the petitioners. 6. Consequently, the bail application under Section 483 B.N.S.S. is allowed and it is directed that the petitioner Ummar Mohammad S/o Fateh Mohammad, be released on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court on all subsequent dates of hearing till conclusion of the trial. (PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR),J Chandan/113