M/S NATIONAL MINERAL DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION LTD v. UNION OF INDIA
WP/105385/2024 · 2026-09-30
Addl Registrar Judicial
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 43823 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 43823 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-D:13149 WP No. 105385 of 2024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA,AT DHARWAD DATED THIS THE 24TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURAJ GOVINDARAJ WRIT PETITION NO. 105385 OF 2024 (T-RES) BETWEEN:
M/S NATIONAL MINERAL DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION LTD., REPRESENTED BY ITS AUTHORISED OFFICER M JAGADIS S/O. PCS MADHURACHARI, AGE: 55 YEARS, DONIMALAI IRON ONRE, DONIMALAI TOWN SHIP, TALUK: SANDUR, DISTRICT BELLARY 583118 GSTIN 29AAACN7325AIZQ …PETITIONER (BY SRI. GAYATRI S R, ADVOCATE)
AND:
1.
UNION OF INDIA THROUGH ITS SECRETARY MINISTRY OF FINANCE DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, ROOM NO 46, NORTH BLOCK, NEW DELHI 110001.
2.
THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF COMMERCIAL TAXES (AUDIT) HOSAPETE, 2ND CROSS NEHARU COLONY, HOSAPETE 583203. …RESPONDENTS (COPY OF WP TO R1 IS SERVED)
THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO I. ISSUE WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO QUASH IMPUGNED ORDER DATED 30.10.2023 BEARING NO DCCT (AUDIT)/HPT/GST-ADJN/ORDER/2023-24/T-
Digitally signed by SHWETHA RAGHAVENDRA Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
- 2 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-D:13149 WP No. 105385 of 2024
433 ISSUED BY RESPONDENT NO.2 WHICH IS PRODUCED AT ANNEXURE-D IN THE ENDS OF JUSTICE.II. ISSUE WRIT IN THE NATURE OF MANDAMUS DIRECTING THE RESPONDENT NO.2 TO RE CONSIDER THE CASE OF THE PETITIONER BY PROVIDING SUFFICIENT OPPORTUNITY OF BEING HEARD, IN THE ENDS OF JUSTICE.III. ISSUE ANY OTHER APPROPRIATE WRIT OR ORDER OR DIRECTION WHICH DEEMS FIT TO GRANT BY THIS HON BLE COURT UNDER THE FACTS AND CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR DISMISSAL THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
ORAL ORDER (PER: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURAJ GOVINDARAJ)
1. Despite the order dated 10.09.2025, office objections have not been complied with.
2. It appears that the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the matter.
3. The petition is dismissed for non-prosecution.
SD/- (SURAJ GOVINDARAJ) JUDGE
AM CT:PA List No.: 3 Sl No.: 105