- 1 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010642482026 NC: 2026:KHC:54496 WP No. 29307 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 30TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH WRIT PETITION NO.29307 OF 2026 (KLR-RES) BETWEEN: SRI. RAMEGOWDA S/O. LATE NINGEGOWDA AGED ABOUT 71 YEARS R/AT MADDUR-MALAVALLI ROAD, NEAR K.E.B. OFFICE. C.A. KERE HOBLI, MADDUR TALUK K. M. DODDI, BHARATHI NAGAR, MANDYA DISTRICT-571428. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. KUMAR K.G., ADVOCATE FOR SRI. BORALINGE GOWDA M.B., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER MANDYA DISTRICT, MANDYA-571401. 2. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER MANDYA SUB-DIVISION, MANDYA-571401. 3. REVENUE INSPECTOR C. A. KERE-1 HOBLI, Digitally signed by CHAYA S A Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010642482026 NC: 2026:KHC:54496 WP No. 29307 of 2026 MADDUR TALUK, MANDYA DISTRICT – 571428. 4. THE THASILDAR MADDUR TALUK, MADDUR, MANDYA DISTRICT – 571428. 5. SMT. JAYAMMA @ NINGAMMA W/O. LATE, CHIKKASIDDEGOWDA MAJOR IN AGE, R/AT DEVARAHALLI VILLAGE, C. A. KERE HOBLI, MADDUR TALUK, MANDYA DISTRICT – 571428. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. ADITYA DIWAKARA, AGA FOR R1 TO R4) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO QUASH THE IMPUGNED ORDER DATED 19-08-2025 PASSED BY THE RESPONDENT NO.1 IN REV. PETITION NO.52/2024 ANNEXURE-H, BY CONFIRMING THE IMPUGNED ORDER OF THE RESPONDENT NO.2 IN R.MISC.NO.346/2021 DATED 27-11-2023 ANNEXURE-G IN RESPECT OF MUTATION ENTRY VIDE MR NO.72/2006-07 ANNEXURE – D; AND ETC. - 3 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010642482026 NC: 2026:KHC:54496 WP No. 29307 of 2026 THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH ORAL ORDER 1. Heard learned counsel appearing for the parties. 2. Petitioner is claiming right over the property based on the registered sale deed dated 29.05.1953 and has sought for change of entry in respect of the subject land, by entering the name of the petitioner in the revenue records, after 75 years. 3. In that view of the matter, no interference is called for, as the reasons assigned by the respondent – authorities are just and proper and accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed. However, it is open for the petitioner to establish right over the subject land in a manner known to law and thereafter approach the respondent – authorities for necessary action. SD/- (E.S.INDIRESH) JUDGE sac List No.: 1 Sl No.: 30