Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 43813 (KAR)

SMT. LAKSHMAMMA v. STATE OF KARNATAKA

WP/25818/2026 · 2026-09-29

E S Indiresh

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010565012026 NC: 2026:KHC:53855 WP No. 25818 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 29TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH WRIT PETITION NO.25818 OF 2026 (KLR-RR/SUR) BETWEEN: 1. SMT. LAKSHMAMMA W/O GOPALAPPA, AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS, R/O MALLASANDRA VILLAGE, NARSAPURA HOBLI, KOLAR TALUK AND DISTRICT - 560 057. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. BHARATH KUMAR V., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA THROUGH ADDL. CHIEF SECRETARY, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, VIDHANA SOUDHA, DR.B.R. AMBEDKAR VEEDHI, BENGALURU - 560 001. 2. THE TAHSILDAR, KOLAR TALUK, KOLAR-560 057. Digitally signed by CHAYA S A Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010565012026 NC: 2026:KHC:53855 WP No. 25818 of 2026 3. REVENUE INSPECTOR, NARSAPURA HOBLI, KOLAR TALUK AND DISTRICT- 560057. 4. VILLAGE ACCOUNTANT, MALLASANDRA VILLAGE, NARSAPURA HOBLI, KOLAR TALUK AND DISTRICT-560 057. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. MOHAMMED JAFFAR SHAH, AGA) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO DIRECT THE RESPONDENT NO.2 HEREIN TO MUTATE THE NAME OF THE PRESENT PETITIONER I.E., SMT. LAKSHMAMMA, W/O GOPALAPPA IN ALL REVENUE RECORDS AND KATHA IN RESPECT OF LAND TO THE EXTENT OF 1 ACRE 30 GUNTAS IN SY. NO.1, SITUATED AT MALLASANDRA VILLAGE, NARASAPURA HOBLI, KOLAR TALUK AND DISTRICT. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH - 3 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010565012026 NC: 2026:KHC:53855 WP No. 25818 of 2026 ORAL ORDER 1. The learned Additional Government Advocate accepts notice on behalf of the respondents. 2. Heard Sri. Bharath Kumar V., learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and Sri. Mohammed Jaffar Shah, learned Additional Government Advocate appearing for the respondent-State. 3. The petitioner has sought a direction to respondent No. 2 to consider the representation dated 30.11.2024 produced at Annexure-A. 4. A perusal of the representation at Annexure-A would indicate that the land in question has been granted in favour of the petitioner. In that view of the matter, respondent No.2-Tahsildar is directed to consider the representation dated 30.11.2024 produced at Annexure-A, after verifying the original records available in its office, and take a decision in - 4 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010565012026 NC: 2026:KHC:53855 WP No. 25818 of 2026 accordance with law, within an outer limit of three months from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this order. 5. Accordingly, the writ petition stands disposed of. Sd/- (E.S.INDIRESH) JUDGE SB List No.: 1 Sl No.: 20