Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 4381 (JHR)

ROHIT KUMAR @ GOLU @ TIGER v. STATE OF JHARKHAND

B.A./1873/2026 · 2026-03-13

Deepak Roshan

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2026:JHHC:6776 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 1873 of 2026 --------- Rohit Kumar @ Golu @ Tiger, aged about 22 years, son of Raj Kumar Thathera, Resident of village Dhobi Tola, Telaiya Road, Barhi, P.O. + P.S. Barhi, District Hazaribagh, State Jharkhand. ....Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand ....Opp. Party --------- CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK ROSHAN --------- For the Petitioner : Mr. Ashok Kr. Singh, Advocate For the Opp. Party : Mr. Bhola Nath Ojha, A.P.P. --------- 02/ 13.03.2026 Heard learned counsels for the parties. 2. The instant bail application has been preferred by the petitioner for grant of regular bail for the offences registered under Sections 17(a)/ 21(a)/ 22(a)/ 29 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case since his name appeared in the FIR only on the basis of suspicion. No incriminating article has been recovered or seized from the conscious possession of the petitioner and only 1.82 grams brown sugar was recovered from the possession of the petitioner which falls under the category of small quantity. Learned counsel further submits that petitioner has no criminal antecedent. He further submits that petitioner is languishing in custody since 07.01.2026; as such, the petitioner may be enlarged on bail. Learned counsel further submits that the petitioner is ready to abide by every condition imposed by this court. 4. Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for bail of the petitioner. 5. Having regard to the facts of the case and looking to the allegation against the petitioner coupled with the fact that small quantity of brown sugar was recovered from the possession of the petitioner; I am inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. Accordingly, the petitioner is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond 2026:JHHC:6776 2 of Rs.20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Sessions Judge-cum- Special Judge, NDPS Act, Koderma, in connection with Telaiya P.S. Case No. 5 of 2026. 6. It is made clear that the petitioner shall appear on each and every date before the learned trial court and if any adverse report will come against the petitioner, learned trial court shall be at liberty to cancel the bail of the petitioner. (Deepak Roshan, J.) 13th March, 2026 kunal/- Uploaded on 16.03.2026