Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 43804 (KAR)

SMT SOWMYA B M v. SRI K THIBBAIAH @ THIBBEGOWDA

WP/34541/2025 · 2026-09-28

K V Aravind

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010739402025 NC: 2026:KHC:54182 WP No. 34541 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 28TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K. V. ARAVIND WRIT PETITION NO. 34541 OF 2025 (GM-CPC) BETWEEN: 1. SMT. SOWMYA B.M., W/O. LATE SUNDARESHA, AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS, GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEE. 2. PRINITHA S. GOWDA, D/O LATE SUNDARESHA, AGED ABOUT 5 YEARS, MINOR, R/BY NATURAL GUARDIAN/MOTHER PETITIONER NO.1. 3. PUNARVA S. GOWDA, S/O LATE SUNDARESHA, AGED ABOUT 3 YEARS, MINOR, R/BY NATURAL GUARDIAN/MOTHER PETITIONER NO.1. …PETITIONERS (BY SMT. VAISHALI HEGDE, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. SRI K. THIBBAIAH @ THIBBEGOWDA, S/O KUNDAGALASANA THIBBAIAH, Digitally signed by VINUTHA B S Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010739402025 NC: 2026:KHC:54182 WP No. 34541 of 2025 AGED ABOUT 80 YEARS, AGRICULTURIST, 2. SRI. JAGADEESHA G.T. S/O THIBBAIAH @ THIBBEGOWDA, AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS, ENGINEER, BOTH ARE R/AT GATTAHALLI VILLAGE, KOWDLE DAKALE, KOPPA HOBLI. 3. SMT. SUNDARAMMA @ SHARADA, W/O LATE SURESHGIRI, AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS, HOUSE WIFE, NO.55, NEW NO.60, 34TH MAIN, KUMARASWAMY LAYOUT, 2ND STAGE, BANGALORE SOUTH, J.P. NAGAR, BANGALORE - 560 078. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. CHETHAN B C., ADVOCATE FOR R1 TO R3) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO-QUASH THE ORDER DATED 12.08.2025 PASSED ON IA NO. 3 IN OS NO. 26/2023 BY THE LEARNED SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE MADDIR, VIDE ANNX-A AND ETC,. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K. V. ARAVIND - 3 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010739402025 NC: 2026:KHC:54182 WP No. 34541 of 2025 ORAL ORDER Learned counsel appearing for the parties jointly submit a memo seeking withdrawal of the present writ petition, in view of the settlement arrived at between the parties. 2. The memo is taken on record. 3. In view of the settlement arrived at between the parties and the submission made, the present writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Sd/- (K. V. ARAVIND) JUDGE DDU List No.: 1 Sl No.: 134