CRWP-5298 IN THE (144 ) JYOTI BHAT STATE OF P CORAM: Present: MANISHA B 1. the Constituti directing the o of the petition on their repres 2. submitted tha 04.05.2026 be raising their g has not yet 5298-2026 (O&M) (1) THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB CHANDIGARH Da BHATTI AND ANOTHER Versus
OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE MA Mr. Vikas Kumar, Advocate for th Ms. Ruchika Sabherwal, Senior D ****
HA BATRA, J. (ORAL) The present petition has been file stitution of India seeking issuance the official respondents No.2 and 3 t etitioners at the hands of respondents N representation dated 04.05.2026 (Anne At the very outset, learned coun d that the petitioners have recently 26 before the Commissioner of Police heir grievances as mentioned in the p been considered and no action JAB AND HARYANA AT ARH
CRWP-5298-2026 (O&M) Date of decision : 06.05.2026 ... Petitioners
...Respondents E MANISHA BATRA
e for the petitioners nior DAG, Punjab en filed under Article 226/227 of suance of a writ of mandamus nd 3 to protect the life and liberty dents No.4 to 8 and to take action (Annexure P-5). d counsel for the petitioners has cently filed a representation on Police, Jalandhar (Annexure P-5) the present petition but the same action has been taken thereon. He AMIT SHARMA 2026.05.06 16:53 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment. CRWP-5298 further submit appropriate di Police, Jaland petitioners and 3. 4. notice on beha be done in due her during the 5. commenting a disposed of at aforesaid rep petitioners wit order in accord petitioners, the in order to pro
06.05.2026 Amit Sharma 5298-2026 (O&M) (2) submitted that at this stage, the petiti iate directions are issued to respond Jalandhar to decide the aforesaid r rs and take necessary action thereon. Notice of motion. Ms. Ruchika Sabherwal, Senior n behalf of the respondents-State and s in due course. Let a complete set of th ng the course of the day. In view of the limited prayer mad ting anything on the merits of the c of at this stage with a direction to res d representation dated 04.05.2026 rs within a period of 15 days from to accordance with law. Needless to say, rs, the official respondents would pro to protect their life and liberty. Whether speaking/reasoned:
   petitioners would be satisfied if spondent No.2-Commissioner of said representation filed by the reon. enior DAG, Punjab, has advance e and submits that the needful will et of the paperbook be supplied to r made by the petitioners, without he case, the present petition is to respondent No.2 to decide the 2026 (Annexure P-5) of the rom today, by passing a speaking to say, if any threat is found to the ld provide them adequate security (MANISHA BATRA)
JUDGE
ned:- Yes/No

AMIT SHARMA 2026.05.06 16:53 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment.