IMTIYAZ AHMAD SHAH v. UT OF J AND K TH COMMISSIONER SECRETARY, FOREST, ECOLOGY AND ENVIRONMENT DEPARTMENT AND OTHERS
WP(C)/122/2026 · 2026-01-30
Wasim Sadiq Nargal
Writ Petition (Civil)body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 438 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 438 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU
Case: WP(C) No. 122/2026
Imtiyaz Ahmed Shah
..... Petitioner(s)/Appellant(s)
Through :- Mr. Abdul Rehman Mattoo, Advocate
Vs
U.T. of J&K and Ors. .....Respondent(s)
Through :-
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE WASIM SADIQ NARGAL, JUDGE
ORDER 30.01.2026
During the course of arguments, the issue of maintainability of the instant petition was raised, as the challenge pertains to the order dated 16.10.2025, passed by learned Railway Magistrate in an execution petition, whereby the salary of the petitioner has been ordered to be attached at the rate of Rs. 30,000/- per month pursuant to an execution petition arising out of the National Lok Adalat Award dated 17.02.2024. When confronted with the maintainability of the instant petition, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks withdrawal of the instant petition with liberty to seek appropriate remedy under law. His statement is taken on record.
In view of the statement made by learned counsel for the petitioner, the instant petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for.
(WASIM SADIQ NARGAL)
JUDGE
JAMMU 30.01.2026 Mihul
Sr. No. 25