Suresh Rai @ Suresh Kumar Rai v. The State of Bihar
CR. MISC./88051/2025 · 2026-01-12
Sunil Dutta Mishra
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 43798 (PAT) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 43798 (PAT) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.88051 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-276 Year-2025 Thana- PIPRAKOTHI District- East Champaran ======================================================
1. Suresh Rai @ Suresh Kumar Rai S/o- Yadolal Rai Resident of Kishunpur Ps- Piprakothi District- East Champaran Bihar
2. Mukesh Kumar S/o- Ramprit Rai Resident of Kishunpur Ps- Piprakothi District- East Champaran Bihar
3. Arun Rai S/o- Harendra Ray @ Harendra Rai Resident of Kishunpur Ps- Piprakothi District- East Champaran Bihar
4. Ashok Rai S/o- Harendra Ray @ Harendra Rai Resident of Kishunpur Ps- Piprakothi District- East Champaran Bihar
5. Yadolal @ Yadolal Rai S/o- Late Babu Ram Rai Resident of Kishunpur Ps- Piprakothi District- East Champaran Bihar ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Sanjay Kumar Tiwari, Advocate For the State : Mr. Jharkhandi Upadhyay, APP For the Informant : Mr. Abhishek Ranjan, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL DUTTA MISHRA ORAL ORDER 2 12-01-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, learned A.P.P. for the State and learned counsel for the informant. 2. The petitioners apprehend their arrest in a case registered under Sections 191(2), 191(3), 190, 126(2), 115(2), 118(2), 109, 74, 303(2), 352 and 351(3) of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita. 3. As per prosecution case, on the alleged date of occurrence, all the F.I.R. named accused persons including the petitioners having armed with lathi, danda, farsa and pistol
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.88051 of 2025(2) dt.12-01-2026 2/3 came at the house of the informant and assaulted the informant and her family members due to which they sustained injuries. It is further alleged that the accused persons outraged the modesty of informant and her daughter and also snatched gold ornaments and cash. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that petitioners are innocent and have falsely been implicated in the present case due to ulterior motive and dirty village politics. Further submission is that petitioners and informant are agnates and due to previous dispute, scuffle took place between them in which both sides sustained injuries. There is case and counter case between the parties. The nature of the injury to the injured is simple. Petitioners have no criminal antecedent. They undertake to cooperate in the investigation and trial. 5. Learned A.P.P. appearing on behalf of the State and learned counsel for the informant opposed the bail application. 6.
Having considered the facts and circumstances of the case and submissions of learned counsel for the parties, let the above named petitioners be released on bail, in the event of arrest or surrender before the learned court below within a period of six weeks from today, on furnishing bail bonds of
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.88051 of 2025(2) dt.12-01-2026 3/3 Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Motihari, East Champaran in connection with Piprakothi P.S. Case No. 276 of 2025, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 482(2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita. utkarsh/- (Sunil Dutta Mishra, J) U T