Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Himachal Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 4379 (HP)

SUSHEEL KUMAR v. RAKESH KANWAR AND ANOTHER

COPC/212/2026 · 2026-04-29

Sushil Kukreja

Contempt Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 ( 2026:HHC:14159 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA COPC No.212 of 2026 Date of Decision: 29.04.2026 ___________________________________________________ Susheel Kumar ....Petitioner Versus Rakesh Kanwar & another …Respondents ___________________________________________________ Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sushil Kukreja, Judge Whether approved for reporting?1 ________________________________________________ For the petitioner : Mr. Rocky, Advocate. For the respondents : Mr. B.N. Sharma, Additional Advocate General. ________________________________________________ Sushil Kukreja, Judge (Oral) Learned Additional Advocate General has placed on record communication dated 25.04.2026, alongwith copy of office order dated 24.04.2026, wherein it has been stated as under:- “….the Principal of concerned school where the petitioner is presently working is hereby directed to fix the pay of the petitioners from the date of initial joining on contract basis at the (60%) of minimum of revised pay scale alongwith such hike to which he is entitled to in terms of revised notification till his/her regularization subject to final outcome of LPA being filed by State and other legal remedies.” 1 Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2 ( 2026:HHC:14159 ) 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner states that in view of the office order dated 24.04.2026, he does not want to press this contempt petition. 3. In view of the above, no further order is required to be passed in the present petition and the matter is closed. Consequently, the contempt petition is dismissed as not pressed. Notice discharged. ( Sushil Kukreja ) April 29, 2026 Judge (V. Himalvi)