Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 4378 (JHR)

ANANT KUMAR SINGH v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

A.B.A./489/2026 · 2026-01-30

Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

( 2026:JHHC:2434 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A. B. A. No. 489 of 2026 1. Anant Kumar Singh, son of late Jagdish Singh, aged 53 years, r/o Chengarbasa, PO Bajto, PS & District Giridih. 2. Ravindra Singh @ Ravindra Narayan Singh @ Rabindra Narayan Singh, s/o late Jagdish Singh, aged 31 years, r/o Chengarbasa, PO Bajto, PS & District Giridih. 3. Bikrant Kumar Singh @ Bikrant Narayan Singh, s/o Dhiren Singh @Dhirendra Narayan Singh, aged 28 years, r/o Guro, PO Senadoni, PS & District Giridih. 4. Raj Kishor Singh, s/o Late Garud Narayan Singh, aged 67 years, r/o Chengarbasa, PO Bajto, PS & District Giridih. 5. Shambhu Prasad Singh @ Shambhu Singh, s/o Lalmani Singh, aged 41 years, r/o Guro, PO Senadoni, PS & District Giridih. 6. Sikendra Prasad Singh @ Sikandar Kumar Singh @ Sikendra Singh, s/o Lalmuni Singh @ Lalmani Singh, aged 31 years, r/o Guro, PO Senadoni, PS & District Giridih. 7. Prashant Kumar Singh, s/o Anant Kumar Singh @ Anant Singh, aged 26 years, r/o Kashitand, PO Nagnagar, PS Barwadda, District Dhanbad. ...... … Petitioners Versus The State of Jharkhand .…. … Opposite Party -------- CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI For the Petitioners :Mr. Yogesh Modi, Advocate Ms. Anam Iqbal, Advocate For the State : Mr. Ajay Kumar Pathak, A.P.P. 02/ 30.01.2026: Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for the State. 2. The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in connection with Giridih (M) P.S. Case No. 19/2025, registered under sections 103(1)/351(2)/61(2) of BNS, pending in the Court of learned S.D.J.M, Giridih. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioner nos. 1 and 4 are farmers, petitioner no. 2 is a teacher, petitioner no.3 works at cloth shop in Giridih, petitioner no. 5 is a mason, petitioner no.6 is an electrical mechanic and petitioner no. 7 works at Banglore as Mason. He submits that the father of the informant has died due to drowning in the water and there is general and omnibus allegation against the petitioners. He ( 2026:JHHC:2434 ) next submits that in identical situation co-accused persons have been granted anticipatory bail in A.B.A. No. 5322 of 2025. On these grounds, he submits that the petitioners may kindly be provided privilege of anticipatory bail. 4. Learned counsel for the State opposes the prayer and submits that petitioners are named in F.I.R. 5. Considering that the petitioner nos. 1 and 4 are farmers, petitioner no. 2 is a teacher, petitioner no.3 works at cloth shop in Giridih, petitioner no. 5 is a mason, petitioner no.6 is an electrical mechanic and petitioner no. 7 works at Banglore as Mason, there are general and omnibus allegation against the petitioners and in identical situation co-accused persons have been granted anticipatory bail in the aforesaid A.B.A, I am inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners. Accordingly, the above named, petitioners are directed to surrender before the learned court within three weeks from today and in the event of their surrender / arrest, the petitioners shall be released on bail, on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 25,000/- (twenty five thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each, to the satisfaction of learned S.D.J.M, Giridih, in connection with Giridih (M) P.S. Case No. 19/2025, subject to conditions as laid down under Section 482 (2) of B.N.S.S, 2023. Dt.30.01.2026 ( Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, J.) satyarthi-