Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010065372026
2026:GAU-AS:5082
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : AB/717/2026 FATINUR ALI SON OF MALEK ALI, R/O VILLAGE 1 NO BARUAPATHAR, P.S. BOKO, DIST. KAMRUP, ASSAM VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM REPRESENTED BY THE PP, ASSAM Advocate for the Petitioner : MR A K AZAD, MR A K KHAN,MR. I HUSSAIN Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM,
BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRANJAL DAS ORDER 06.04.2026
1. Heard Mr. A. K. Azad, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. P. Borthakur, learned Additional Public Prosecutor, for the State respondent. 2. This is an application under Section 482 BNSS, 2023 praying for granting transit anticipatory bail to the accused/petitioner, Fatenur Ali, who is apprehending arrest in connection with PRC Case No. 502/2025 under Section 310(2)/61(2) /111(2)(b) /111(3) /111(4) /140(2) /310(5)/310(4) BNS arising out of Barama PS No. 61/2025. Page No.# 2/3
3. The allegation in the FIR dated 16.07.2025 is decoity of a truck bearing registration No. RJ09QE6232 carrying pan masala of Rs.80 lakhs. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that his mouth was gagged by cloth and left near Bhawanipur Out Post, whereupon he informed that said outpost and his mobile phone was left in the truck, from which the police gathered more information. 4. The learned counsel fairly submits that earlier bail petition on his behalf was rejected on 19/09/2025 in AB 1978/2025. Though initially he was granted interim bail, but after perusing of case diary, same was rejected. 5. It is submitted that in the meantime, the investigation stood completed in the case, resulting in the charge sheet being CS No. 65/2025 dated 20.10.2025. 6. The learned counsel has also drawn attention of the court to the narration in point No. 25 with regard to the present petition. It is stated therein about his involvement with the alleged offenses of dacoity on the trucks. 7. It appears that after completion of investigation, cognizance has been taken and it is at the stage of appearance. It is also submitted that except 3 accused persons, including the present petitioner, the other accused persons are presently on bail. Copies of the relevant documents such as charge sheet, etc. have been annexed with the petition. 8.
In view of the completion of investigation and the stage of the case and the undertaking on behalf of the petitioner that he is willing to participate in the trial - I deem it fit to allow this subsequent bail
Page No.# 3/3 condition. 9. Accordingly, it is provided that the accused petitioner, named above, shall be released on bail of Rs.50,000/- with one suitable surety of like amount to the satisfaction of learned concerned court subject to the following conditions that the petitioner:
(i) shall appear before the learned court as and when required. (ii) shall be available for trial if one commences. (iii) shall not hamper or tamper with evidence. (iv) shall not commit any illegal activities. 10. The petitioner shall submit fresh bail bonds before the learned court, whereupon necessary orders shall be passed. 11. Violation of bail conditions entails cancellation of bail. 12. Accordingly, the bail petition stands allowed and disposed of. JUDGE Comparing Assistant