Research › Search › Judgment

Patna High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 43777 (PAT)

Prechandra Yadav v. The State of Bihar

CR. MISC./87630/2025 · 2026-01-12

Sunil Dutta Mishra

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.87630 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-105 Year-2025 Thana- Mufassil District- Khagaria ====================================================== 1. Prechandra Yadav Son of Chamru Yadav Resident of Village- Kumharchakki PS -Muffasil District- Khagaria 2. Sanjit Yadav Son of Chamru Yadav Resident of Village- Kumharchakki PS -Muffasil District- Khagaria 3. Budal Yadav @ Budul Yadav Son of Sushil yadav Resident of Village- Kumharchakki PS -Muffasil District- Khagaria 4. Ramachu yadav Son of Late Suresh Yadav Resident of Village- Kumharchakki PS -Muffasil District- Khagaria 5. Karelal Yadav @ Sachindra Yadav Son of Ganesh yadav Resident of Village- Kumharchakki PS -Muffasil District- Khagaria ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Amar Kumar Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Murli Dhar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL DUTTA MISHRA ORAL ORDER 2 12-01-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned A.P.P. for the State. 2. The petitioners apprehend their arrest in a case registered under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 303(2), 109, 352, 351(2), 351(3) and 4(5) of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita. 3. As per prosecution case, all the accused persons including the petitioners abused and assaulted the informant and his brother due to which they sustained injuries. Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.87630 of 2025(2) dt.12-01-2026 2/3 4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that petitioners are innocent and have falsely been implicated in the present case due to malice and previous grudge. Further submission is that on the alleged date of occurrence, a free fight took place between the parties over the dispute with regard to DJ sound, in which both sides sustained injury. The F.I.R. has been lodged after a delay of 12 days without any plausible reason. There is case and counter case between the parties for the same occurrence. Allegations against the petitioners are general and omnibus. The nature of the injury to the injured is simple. Petitioners have no criminal antecedent. They undertake to cooperate in the investigation and trial. 5. Learned A.P.P. appearing on behalf of the State opposed the bail application. 6. Having considered the facts and circumstances of the case and submissions of learned counsel for the parties, let the above named petitioners be released on bail, in the event of arrest or surrender before the learned court below within a period of six weeks from today, on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Khagaria in connection with Muffasil P.S. Case No. Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.87630 of 2025(2) dt.12-01-2026 3/3 105 of 2025, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 482(2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita. utkarsh/- (Sunil Dutta Mishra, J) U T