Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Orissa · body

2026 DAILYLAW 4377 (ORI)

BRUNDABAN PANDA v. SUB REGISTRAR, HATADIHI, KEONJHAR

WP(C)/6112/2026 · 2026-04-16

Sashikanta Mishra

Writ Petition (Civil)body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

p. 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK W.P.(C) No. 6112 of 2026 Brundaban Panda and Others …. Petitioners Represented by Mr. S. Mantry, Advocate -Versus – Sub-Registrar, Hatadihi, Keonjhar …. Opp. Party Represented by Mr. A.R. Dash, AGA CORAM: JUSTICE SASHIKANTA MISHRA ORDER_ 16.04.2026 1. This matter is taken up through hybrid mode. 2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for the State. 3. The order impugned can be challenged in appeal under Section 72 of the Registration Act. The writ petition is therefore disposed of granting liberty to the petitioners to challenge the impugned order by filing appeal before the appropriate authority within ten days from today. If such appeal is preferred along with application seeking condonation of delay, the appellate authority shall consider the same liberally and hear the appeal on its own merit. The appeal shall he disposed of as early as possible, preferably within a period of two months. 4. Urgent certified copy of this order be granted on proper application. (Sashikanta Mishra) Judge BC.TUDU Order No. 1. Designation: Sr. Stenographer