Kakarlapudi Satyanarayana Raju v. Madduri Venkataratnam (Since Dead by LRs)
CRP/3836/2017 · 2026-07-01
Venkateswarlu Nimmagadda
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 4376 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 4376 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Date of reserved for orders : Date of pronouncement :02.07.2026 Date of uploading : APHC010297282017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3329] THURSDAY, THE 2nd DAY OF JULY 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 3836/2017 Between:
1. KAKARLAPUDI SATYANARAYANA RAJU, S/O.LATE ANANTHA PADMANABHARAJU, OCC: CULTIVATION R/O.3-57/2, SURANNA NAGAR, VAKALAPUDI, KRISHNA - 533 005. 2. KAKARLAPUDI VENKATA SUBBA RAJU, S/O.LATE ANANTHA PADMANABHARAJU, OCC: CULTIVATION R/O.70-14-11/A, JAYENDRA NAGAR, KAKINADA - 533 003. 3. VATSAVAYI VENKATA TIRUPATHI RAJU, S/O.CHINNA VENKATA NARASIMHARAJU, OCC: CULTIVATION R/O.D.NO.2-495/13, ROAD NO.1, AISHWARYA NAGAR, KAKINADA RURAL - 533 006. 4. VATSAVAYI VEERA VENKATA SATYANARAYANA VARMA, S/O.SURYANARAYANARAJU, OCC: CULTIVATION R/O.H.NO.18-121, MADHURAWADA, PORT COLONY, VISAKHAPATNAM - 530 035. 5. JAMPANA SATYANARAYANA RAJU, S/O.VENKATAPATHI RAJU, OCC: CULTIVATION R/O.D.NO.68/5/2, DOWN STAIRS, GEETAM SCHOOL, OPPOSITE STREET, ASHOK NAGAR, NEAR VEERKAMAL THEATRE, KAKINADA. 6. MANTHENA RAKESH, S/O.SURYANARAYANA RAJU R/O.F.NO.301, BLOCK-B, SRI SAI NILAYAM, BALAJI HILLS COLONY, NIZAMPET, HYDERABAD - 500 090. 7. KAKARLAPUDI ADI NARAYANARAJU, S/O.SATYANARAYANARAJU, OCC: CULTIVATION R/O.KOLAANKA, KAJULURU MANDAL, EAST
2
GODAVARI DISTRICT. 8. VATSAVAYI SUBHARAYYAMMA, S/O.VEERABHADRARAJU, OCC: HOUSEWIFE R/O.D.NO.2-495/13, ROAD NO.1,
AISHWARYA NAGAR, KAKINADA RURAL - 533 006. ...PETITIONER(S) AND
1. MADDURI VENKATARATNAM SINCE DEAD BY LRS, 1.MADDURI VENKATARAMAN S/O.LATE VENKATARATHNAM, HINDU, AGED 60 YEARS R/O.D.NO.8-4-21, ASHOK NAGAR, GAJUWAKA, VISAKHAPATNAM. 2. MADDURI SRI KRISHNA PARAMATMA, S/O.LATE VENKATATHNAM, HINDU R/O.D.NO.3-17-50/4, KANAIAH KAPU NAGAR, KAKINADA. 3. AKULA ADILAKSHMI DIED, -
4. MADDURI TALLEMMA, W/O.LATE VENKATATHNAM, HINDU R/O.D.NO.3-17-50/4, KANAIAH KAPU NAGAR, KAKINADA. 5. SOMESETTI MADHAVI, W/O.KOTESWARA RA, HINDU, HOUSEWIFE R/O.D.NO.3-17-50/4, KANAIAH KAPU NAGAR, KAKINADA. 6. KUPPALA SURYAKUMARI, W/O.KANAKAESWARA RAO, HINDU, HOUSEWIFE R/O.D.NO.3-17-50/4, KANAIAH KAPU NAGAR, KAKINADA. 7. KOLA MEENAKSHI, W/O.VENKATARAMANA, HINDU, HOUSEWIFE R/O.D.NO.3-17-50/4, KANAIAH KAPU NAGAR, KAKINADA. 8. AKULA SAYANARAYANA, S/O.NOT KNOWN R/O.BALABHADRAPURAM, BICCAVOLE MANDAL, ANAPARTHI J.C.J.C.
9. AKULA BHASKARA RAO, S/O.NOT KNOWN R/O.BALABHADRAPURAM, BICCAVOLE MANDAL, ANAPARTHI J.C.J.C.
10. AKULA VENKATA RAMANA, S/O.SATYANARAYANA R/O.BALABHADRAPURAM, BICCAVOLE MANDAL, ANAPARTHI
3
J.C.J.C.
11.
AKULA NARAYANA, S/O.SATYANARAYANA R/O.BALABHADRAPURAM, BICCAVOLE MANDAL, ANAPARTHI J.C.J.C.
...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India,praying that in the circumstances stated in the grounds filed herein,the High Court may be pleased toCRP against the order dated 22.12.2016 on the file of the II Additional Senior Civil Judge, Kakinada passed in IA No.1155/2008 in OS No.30/1987 IA NO: 1 OF 2017(CRPMP 5050 OF 2017 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased condone the delay of 98 days in representation of the above CRP IA NO: 2 OF 2017(CRPMP 5051 OF 2017 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased expedite the hearing in the above CRP Counsel for the Petitioner(S):
1. VENKAT CHALLA Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. V VINOD K REDDY
2. E V V S RAVI KUMAR The Court made the following:
4
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 3836 of 2017
ORDER:
When the matter is taken up for hearing, the docket order reveals that there is no representation on behalf of the petitioners on the last occasion i.e., on 24.06.2026. Therefore, on 24.06.2026, the matter is
directed to be listed on 02.07.2026 under the caption ‘for dismissal’. Even though the matter is posted under the caption ‘for dismissal’, today also there is no representation for the petitioners. This shows that the petitioners are not evincing any interest in prosecuting the case.
2. Accordingly, the Civil Revision Petition is dismissed for non- prosecution. There shall be no order as to costs. Consequently, Miscellaneous Petitions, if any, pending in this Revision Petition shall stand closed.
_________________________________ VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA, J 02.07.2026 BSP/TPS Whether the order is : Speaking Yes/No / Reasoned Yes/No Reportable Yes/No / Non-Reportable Yes/No
5
05 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA
CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO:3836/2017
02.07.2026 BSP/TPS