Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 4375 (MAD)

V.PRABAHARAN v. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR

WP/1038/2026 · 2026-04-22

K Surender, S M Subramaniam

Transfer Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

WP No. 1038 of 2026 __________ Page1 of 6 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 22-04-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE S. M. SUBRAMANIAM AND THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE K. SURENDER WP No. 1038 of 2026 V.Prabaharan S/o.Veeramuthu, Alagusamuthiram Village, Steel Plant Post, Salem District. ..Petitioner(s) Vs 1. The District Collector Salem District. 2. The Revenue divisional officer Mettur,Salem District. 3. The Tahsildar Omalur Taluk, Salem District. 4. The Block Development Officer Block Development Office, Omalur , Salem District. 5. Chithayee W/o.Govindhasamy, Alagusamuthiram Village, steel Plant Post, Salem District. 6. Govindhasamy S/o.Chithan, Alagusamuthiram Village, steel Plant Post, Salem District. ..Respondent(s) https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 1038 of 2026 __________ Page2 of 6 To direct the respondents 1 to 4 to take necessary action to remove the encroachments made by the respondents 5 and 6 in S.F.No.112/ 10 and 112/ 13, classified as Government Promboke Land (Pathway) in Alagusamuthiram village, Omalur Taluk, Salem District, by considering petitioner representation dated 01.10.2019 and proceedings of the respondents 1 to 4. WP No. 1038 of 2026 For Petitioner(s): Mr.R.Prabakar For Respondent(s): Mr. T. Arun Kumar, Addl.Govt.Pleader for R1 to R3 Mr. J.C. Durairaj, Addl.Govt.Pleader for R4 R5- not ready in notice No appearance for R6 Order (Order of the Court was made by S.M.Subramaniam J.) Writ of Mandamus has been instituted seeking to direct the respondents 1 to 4 to take necessary action to remove the encroachments made by the respondents 5 and 6 in S.F.No.112/ 10 and 112/ 13, classified as Government Promboke Land (Pathway) in Alagusamuthiram village, Omalur Taluk, Salem District, by considering petitioner’s representation dated 01.10.2019 and proceedings of the respondents 1 to 4. 2. Learned Additional Government Pleader, based on the written instruction given by the Tahsildar, Omalur, would submit that the revenue authorities conducted survey and found that there is no encroachment in S.F.No.112/10. However, the encroachers are identified in S.F.No.112/13, which is classified as natham land. Learned Additional Government Pleader https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 1038 of 2026 __________ Page3 of 6 would further submit that enforcement actions will be initiated for removal of encroachments. 3. That being the factum, the respondents 1 to 4 are directed to initiate enforcement action for removal of encroachments by following the procedures as contemplated under the relevant statues and rules by affording opportunity to the alleged encroachers. 4. In respect of the grama natham lands, the revenue authorities are empowered to invoke the provisions of the Tamilnadu Land Encroachments Act, more specifically, under RSO 21 as well as RSO 26, which would provide powers to the authorities to invoke the Tamilnadu Land Encroachments Act,1905, for removal of encroachments. The said exercise is directed to be completed within a period of twelve weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. 5. With the above directions, the Writ Petition is disposed of. No costs. (S.M.S.,J.) (K.S.,J.) 22-04-2026 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Neutral Citation: Yes/No VSI To 1. The District Collector Salem District 2. The Revenue divisional officer Mettur,Salem District. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 1038 of 2026 __________ Page4 of 6 3. The Tahsildar Omalur Taluk, Salem District. 4. The Block Development Officer Block Development Office, Omalur , Salem District. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 1038 of 2026 __________ Page5 of 6 S.M.SUBRAMANIAM J. AND K.SURENDER J. vsi WP No. 1038 of 2026 22-04-2026 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 1038 of 2026 __________ Page6 of 6 To https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis