Research › Search › Judgment

Patna High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 43731 (PAT)

Subodh Das @ Subodh Kumar Das v. The State of Bihar

CR. MISC./87246/2025 · 2026-01-05

Ashok Kumar Pandey

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.87246 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-344 Year-2025 Thana- BANKA District- Banka ====================================================== Subodh Das @ Subodh Kumar Das S/O Agahan Das Resident of Village- Amba, P.O.- Kunauni, P.S and Distt.- Banka. ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Dhananjay Kumar Pandey, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Prem Kumar Jha, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 2 05-01-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State. 2. The petitioner has prayed for regular bail in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 117(2), 303(2), 109, 308(2), 352, 351(2) & 3(5) of the BNS and under Sections 3/4 of Prevention of witch (Daain) Practices Act. 3. The case of the prosecution, in short, is that the petitioner along with others arrived at the house of the informant being armed with lathi, danda and farsa. Allegation against the petitioner is that he has assaulted with iron rod on the right hand of the informant due to which her hand was fractured. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that there is case and counter case. It has further been submitted that though Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.87246 of 2025(2) dt.05-01-2026 2/2 allegation against the petitioner is that due to his assault right hand of the informant was fractured and the nature of injury is grievous yet these allegations only attract Section 117(2) of the BNS which is bailable in nature. 5. Learned Additional Prosecutor for the State has vehemently opposed the bail application of the petitioner. 6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, this court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The above named petitioner is directed to be released on bail in connection with Banka P.S. Case No. 344 of 2025 on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Banka. durgesh/- (Ashok Kumar Pandey, J) U T