- 1 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010408852026 NC: 2026:KHC:53768 WP No. 18701 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 28TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI M WRIT PETITION NO. 18701 OF 2026 (CS-RES) BETWEEN: SRI. Y.H. NAGARAJ S/O HALAPPA, AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS, R/AT HARIGE, B.H. ROAD, SHIVAMOGGA - 577 202. …PETITIONER (BY SMT. KAVYASHRI, ADVOCATE FOR SRI. KEERTHI REDDY, ADVOCATE AND SMT. TEJASHWINI R., ADVOCATE AND SRI. PADMANAB J., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA DEPARTMENT OF CO-OPERATION, M.S. BUILDING, DR. B.R. AMBEDKAR VEDHI, BENGALURU - 560 001. REPRESENTED BY IT'S PRINCIPAL SECRETARY. 2. THE ASSISTANT REGISTRAR OF CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES, SHIVAMOGGA DISTRICT, SHIVAMOGGA - 577 201. 3. THE RECOVERY OFFICER, SHIVAMOGGA DISTRICT CO-OPERATIVE CENTRAL BANK LTD., SHIVAMOGGA - 577 201. Digitally signed by PREMCHANDRA M R Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010408852026 NC: 2026:KHC:53768 WP No. 18701 of 2026 4. SHIVAMOGGA DISTRICT CO-OPERATIVE CENTRAL BANK LTD., REPRESENTED BY IT'S CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER/ MANAGING DIRECTOR, HEAD OFFICE, SHIVAMOGGA - 577 201. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. YOGESH D. NAIK, AGA FOR R1 TO R3; SRI. KOUSHIK S., ADVOCATE FOR SRI. DAYANAND S PATIL, ADVOCATE FOR R4) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, SEEKING CERTAIN RELIEFS. THIS WRIT PETITION IS LISTED FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN 'B' GROUP, THIS DAY, AN ORDER IS MADE AS UNDER: ORAL ORDER Smt.Kavyashri., counsel on behalf of Sri.Keerthi Reddy., for the petitioner; Sri.Yogesh D.Naik., AGA for respondents 1 to 3 and Sri.Koushik.S., counsel on behalf of Sri.Dayanand S.Patil., for respondent No.4 appeared in person. 2. The present petition has been filed seeking a direction to the Bank to furnish the complete statement of accounts. - 3 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010408852026 NC: 2026:KHC:53768 WP No. 18701 of 2026 3. Counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has since received the complete statement of accounts. It is further submitted that, in view of the grievance having been redressed, nothing further survives for consideration in the present writ petition and, accordingly, the petition may be disposed of. 4. Taking note of the submission made by counsel for the petitioner that the complete statement of accounts has been furnished and received by the petitioner, nothing further survives for consideration in the present writ petition. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of. SD/- (JYOTI M) JUDGE MRP List No.: 1 Sl No.: 100