Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2026 DAILYLAW 4371 (RAJ)

MANGTURAM S/O HARCHAND v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMB/3042/2026 · 2026-03-06

Sameer Jain

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:RJ-JP:9802] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 3042/2026 Mangturam S/o Harchand, Aged About 46 Years, R/o Rasoolpura, Police Station Laxmangarh, District Alwar (Rajasthan) (At Present Confined In Central Jail, Alwar). ----Applicant Versus State Of Rajasthan, through PP ----Respondent For Applicant(s) : Mr. Umesh Kumar Sharma For Respondent(s) : Mr. Jitendra Singh Rathore, PP with Mr. Vinod Sharma and Mr. Sapan Soni HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAMEER JAIN Order 06/03/2026 1. The instant bail application has been filed under Section 483 of BNSS on behalf of accused-applicant. The accused-applicant was arrested in connection with FIR No.75/2026 registered at Police Station Rajgarh, District Alwar for the offence(s) under Section 8/20 of NDPS Act and the learned Trial Court amidst the offences under Sections 8/20 NDPS Act dismissed the bail application before it. 2. Learned counsel for the accused-applicant submits that quantity of contraband ganja recovered is much less than the prescribed commercial quantity i.e., 20 kgs. It is further submitted that the applicant is sole bread earner of the family, having no criminal antecedents. It is also submitted that the applicant is in the custody ever since 06.02.2026. [2026:RJ-JP:9802] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-3042/2026] 3. Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the instant bail application. 4. Having heard the arguments advanced by the learned counsel for the parties, considering that the applicant is sole bread earner of the family; that the applicant is not having any criminal antecedents; that the recovered quantity of contraband is much less than the prescribed commercial quantity and looking to the overall facts and circumstances of the case and material on record but without commenting on merits/demerits of the case, this court is inclined to allow the bail application of the accused-applicant and enlarge him on bail. 5. Accordingly, the bail application under Section 483 of BNSS is allowed and it is ordered that accused-applicant Mangturam S/o Harchand, shall be enlarged on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of learned trial Judge for his appearance before the court concerned on all the dates of hearing as and when called upon to do so. (SAMEER JAIN),J PARSHANT /76