MD. PARWEZ ALIAS PARWEZ ALAM ALIAS PARWEZ ANSARI ALLIAS MD PARWEJ ANSARI v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND
B.A./414/2026 · 2026-02-25
Rajesh Kumar
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 4370 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 4370 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
2026:JHHC:5488 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
B.A No.414 of 2026
Md. Parwez @ Parwez Alam @ Parwez Ansari @ Md. Parwej ansari, aged about 29 years, Son of Md. Mangal Ansari, Resident of Village – Milki Hasai, P.O. - Hasai, P.S. - Dhankund, District – Banka, Bihar. …… Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand ….. Opp. Party --------- CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR --------- For the Petitioner : Mr. Manoj Kr. Sah, Advocate For the State : Mr. V. K. Vashistha, A.P.P ---------
02/Dated: 25
th February, 2026
1. Heard learned counsel for the parties.
2. The applicant, who is in custody since 20.11.2025, has approached this Court for grant of regular bail in connection with Mahagama P.S. Case No.23 of 2025, registered for the offence under Section 316(2)/ 318(4)/ 336(3)/ 338/ 340(2)/ 3(5) of the BNS, 2023, pending in the court of learned Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Godda.
3. It has been submitted by the learned counsel for the applicant that complete set of F.I.R along with its enclosures have been annexed with the present bail application and there is no suppression on his part. Innocence of the applicant has been claimed and undertaking has been given for participation in the trial. It has been submitted that the name of this applicant has transpired on the confessional statement of the apprehended accused. It has further been submitted that similarly situated co-accused have already been enlarged on bail by the Co-ordinate Bench of this Court. On the above basis, prayer for bail has been made.
4. On the other hand, learned counsel for the State has opposed the prayer for bail stating that the incriminating material has been recovered and this applicant has fled away from the place of occurrence, as has been disclosed by the apprehended accused.
5. Considering the materials available on record and the nature of allegation, I am not inclined to enlarge the applicant on bail. Accordingly, the prayer for bail of the applicant is, hereby, rejected.
(Rajesh Kumar, J.) 25th February, 2026 Ravi-Chandan/- Uploaded on 26.02.2026