Research › Search › Judgment

Patna High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 43699 (PAT)

Harun Gaddi @ Harun Miyan v. The State of Bihar

CR. MISC./89801/2025 · 2026-02-04

Sandeep Kumar

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.89801 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-10 Year-2020 Thana- PALANWA District- East Champaran ====================================================== 1. Harun Gaddi @ Harun Miyan S/o Late Mukim Gaddi R/o Vill- Siswaniya, P.S.- Palanwa, Distt- East Champaran 2. Jahur Alam Gaddi S/o Late Mahanth Gaddi R/o Vill- Babuiya, P.S.- Palanwa, Distt- East Champaran 3. Khush Mohammad Gaddi @ Khush Mahumd Gaddi S/o Sipahi Gaddi R/o Vill- Babuiya, P.S.- Palanwa, Distt- East Champaran 4. Jiralal Gaddi S/o Jahur Alam Gaddi @ Jahur Gaddi R/o Vill- Babuiya, P.S.- Palanwa, Distt- East Champaran ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Manjeet Kumar Mishra, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Abhay Kumar Roy, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR ORAL ORDER 2 04-02-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned A.P.P. for the State. 2. The petitioners apprehend arrest in connection with Palanwa P.S. Case No. 10 of 2020 instituted under Sections 341, 379 and 307/34 of the I.P.C. and Section 27 of the Arms Act. 3. As per the prosecution case, petitioners are accused of injuring informant and taking Rs. 41,000/- from him. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.89801 of 2025(2) dt.04-02-2026 2/2 the petitioners have not assaulted anyone and nothing has been recovered from their conscious possession. Petitioner nos. 2 and 3 have clean antecedent and petitioner nos. 4 and 1 have one criminal antecedent. 5. Learned APP for the State has opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioners. 6. Considering the allegations levelled against the petitioners, this is not a fit case for grant of anticipatory bail. 7. Accordingly, the application stands dismissed. 8. The petitioners are directed to surrender within two weeks from today and pray for regular bail, failing which the Superintendent of Police, East Champaran will take all steps for arrest of the petitioners. 9. Let a copy of this order be communicated to the Superintendent of Police, East Champaran through FAX or e- mail for its compliance. tusharika/- (Sandeep Kumar, J) U T