Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 43699 (KAR)

SRI. BOREGOWDA v. STATE OF KARNATAKA

WP/28392/2023 · 2026-09-25

V Srishananda

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010673442023 NC: 2026:KHC:53088 WP No. 28392 of 2023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 25TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA WRIT PETITION NO. 28392 OF 2023 (GM-RES) BETWEEN: 1. SRI. BOREGOWDA AGED 30 YEARS, S/O CHIKKA LINGAIAH, R/AT NO.30, 3RD CROSS, SHIVANANDA NAGAR, MOODALA PALYA, BENGALURU - 560 072. 2. SMT. CHANDRAKALA AGED 39 YEARS, W/O VENKATESH D, R/AT CHIKKAKALYA, BAGINAGERE POST, THIPPASANDRA HOBLI, MAGADI TALUK, RAMANAGARA - 562 131. 3. SRI. MADHUKUMAR AGED 35 YEARS, S/O LATE NARASIMHASHETTY, R/AT NO.8, 1ST MAIN ROAD, NEAR MAHESHWARAMMA TEMPLE, MARENAHALLI, VIJAYANAGARA, BENGALURU - 560 040. …PETITIONERS (BY SMT.MONISHA.N.S, ADVOCATE FOR SRI. DILIPKUMARGOWDA R., ADVOCATE) Digitally signed by ANNAPURNA G Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010673442023 NC: 2026:KHC:53088 WP No. 28392 of 2023 AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA THROUGH INSPECTOR OF POLICE, CHANDRA LAYOUT POLICE STATION, REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, BENGALURU - 560 001. 2. SRI. VIJAY KUMAR AGED 66 YEARS, S/O LATE C. SIDDAPPA, R/AT NO.67/19, 3RD MAIN ROAD, MICO LAYOUT, ATTIGUPPE, VIJAYANAGAR, BENGALURU-560040 …RESPONDENTS (BY SMT.WAHEEDA.M.M., HCGP FOR R1; Notice not issued to R2 for want of PF) THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 & 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE FIR CRIME NO.306/2023 OF CHANDRA LAYOUT POLICE STATION FOR THE OFFENCES PUNISHABLE UNDER SECTIONS 120B, 406, 409, 420, 468, 467, 471, 504, 506 R/W SEC. 34 OF IPC AS FAR AS PETITIONERS ARE CONCERNED, VIDE ANNEXURE-B, ETC., THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: - 3 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010673442023 NC: 2026:KHC:53088 WP No. 28392 of 2023 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA ORAL ORDER Learned counsel for the petitioners has filed a memo dated 12.06.2026 seeking withdrawal of the petition. 2. Memo is placed on record, which reads as follows: "The petitioner respectfully submits that, due to subsequent developments, the Petitioner does not wish to prosecute the above writ petition and therefore seeks permission of this Hon'ble Court to withdraw the same. Wherefore, the petitioner humbly prays that this Hon'ble Court may be pleased to permit the petitioner to withdraw the above writ petition and dispose of the same as withdrawn, in the interest of justice and equity". 3. In view of the memo, petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Sd/- (V SRISHANANDA) JUDGE DH List No.: 1 Sl No.: 3