Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR
CNR: KAHC010119002025 NC: 2026:KHC:52627 WP No. 5713 of 2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 23RD DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI M WRIT PETITION NO. 5713 OF 2025 (SCST-)
BETWEEN:
1. SMT SAVITHA D/O LATE NIRVANA SHETTY AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS R/AT ALLAMPURA CHIKKAMAGALURU TALUK CHIKKAMAGALURU
2. SMT. POORNESH S/O NIRVANA SHETTY AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS R/AT ALLAMPURA CHIKKAMAGALURU TALUK CHIKKAMAGALURU
3. SMT. INDRAMMA W/O OMKARA SHETTY AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS R/AT ALLAMPURA CHIKKAMAGALURU TALUK CHIKKAMAGALURU
4. SRI HARISH S/O RUDRA SHETTY AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS R/AT BILIKALLAHALLI UYDDEBORANAHALLI POST
Digitally signed by PREMCHANDRA M R Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
- 2 -
HC-KAR
CNR: KAHC010119002025 NC: 2026:KHC:52627 WP No. 5713 of 2025
LAKSYA HOBLI, CHIKKAMAGALURU TALUK CHIKKAMAGALURU
5. SMT. SAKAMMA W/O MURTHY AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS R/AT ALLAMPURA , KAIMARA POST, CHIKKAMAGALURU TALUK CHIKKAMAGALURU …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. SUNDARESH H C.,ADVOCATE-ABSENT) AND:
1. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER CHIKKAMAGALURU DISTRICT CHIKKAMAGALURU - 577101. 2. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER CHIKKAMAGALURU SUB DIVISION CHIKKAMAGALURU - 577101. 3. THE TAHASILDHAR CHIKKAMAGALURU TALUK CHIKKAMAGALURU - 577101. 4. SMT. NAGAMMA W/O KECHAIAH AGED ABOUT 80 YEARS R/AT ALLAMPURA KAIMARA POST, CHIKKAMAGALURU TALUK CHIKKAMAGALURU - 577117. …RESPONDENTS (BY SMT. SAVITHRAMMA, AGA FOR R1 TO R3;
R4 SERVED AND UNREPRESENTED)
- 3 -
HC-KAR
CNR: KAHC010119002025 NC: 2026:KHC:52627 WP No. 5713 of 2025
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, SEEKING CERTAIN RELIEFS. THIS WRIT PETITION IS LISTED FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN 'B' GROUP, THIS DAY, AN ORDER IS MADE AS UNDER:
ORAL ORDER
Though matter called twice, there is no representation on behalf of the petitioners, either personally or through video conferencing. 2. As could be seen from the daily order sheet, the petition was listed on 07.08.2026, on that day, there was no representation on behalf of the petitioners. 3. The petition is listed today. As already noted above, though matter called twice, there is no representation on behalf of the petitioners, either personally or through video conferencing. It appears that the petitioners are not interested in prosecuting the petition. Hence, the petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. - 4 -
HC-KAR
CNR: KAHC010119002025 NC: 2026:KHC:52627 WP No. 5713 of 2025
Because of dismissal of the petition, interim order granted if any stands discharged and pending interlocutory applications if any are disposed of.
Sd/-
(JYOTI M)
JUDGE
MRP List No.: 1 Sl No.: 37