Date of reserved for orders : Date of pronouncement : 01.07.2026 Date of uploading : APHC010473522017 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3329] WEDNESDAY, THE 1st DAY OF JULY 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 4149/2017 Between: 1. SANE RAMAKRISHNA REDDY, S/O. LATE SANE NAGI REDDY CULTIVATION R/O. ADAPALA STREET KADIRI TOWN ANANTHAPUR DISTRICT ...PETITIONER AND 1. HULIKERRA SREEENIVASA PRASAD, S/o. Madhava D.No. 6/1/532 Lakshmi Nagr Ananthapur Formerly working as Attender in Principal Junior CivilJudge's court, Kadiri, now woring in Additional District Judge's court, Hindupur, Anantapur District ...RESPONDENT Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India,praying that in the circumstances stated in the grounds filed herein,the High Court may be pleased to IA NO: 1 OF 2013(CRPMP 162 OF 2013 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to condone the delay of 30 days in filing the CRP No. of 2012 agaisnt the orders made in IA No. 543 of 2010 in OS No. Nil of 2009 dated 1-9-2012 on 2 the file of the court of the Prl. Junior Civil Court, Kadiri, Ananthapur District and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. V BHASKARA REDDY Counsel for the Respondent: 1. The Court made the following: 3 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 4149/2017 ORDER: The Civil Revision Petition is filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India aggrieved by the orders passed on 01.09.2012 in I.A.No.543 of 2010 in O.S.No.Nil of 2009 on the file of the Court of the Principal Junior Civil Judge, Kadari, Anantapur District. 2. When the matter is taken up for hearing, it is observed from the docket sheet that on 24.06.2026, there was no representation for the petitioner and the matter is posted to today under the caption ‘For Dismissal’. Even today, there is no representation for the petitioner. 3. Even on merits of the case, the Revision Petition is filed alleging that the claim of the petitioner was rejected in the year 2012. After such rejection, the parties as per their rights and entitlement have been continued in possession and enjoyment of the property more than one and half decade. 4. In view of the lapse of one and half decade, no further orders are necessary in this Revision Petition. 5. Accordingly, the present Civil Revision Petition is closed. No costs. 4 As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. _________________________________ VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA, J 01.07.2026 BSP/TPS Whether the order is : Speaking Yes/No / Reasoned Yes/No Reportable Yes/No / Non-Reportable Yes/No 5 09 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 4149/2017 01.07.2026 BSP/TPS