Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 43669 (KAR)

SRI RAJESH MOHAN v. STATE OF KARNATAKA

WP/5751/2026 · 2026-09-25

V Srishananda

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010128442026 NC: 2026:KHC:53816 WP No.5751 of 2026 C/W WP No.18059 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 25THDAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA WRIT PETITION No.5751 OF 2026 (GM-RES) C/W WRIT PETITION No.18059 OF 2024 (GM-RES) IN W.P. No.5751/2026: BETWEEN: 1. SRI. RAJESH MOHAN S/O MOHAN NAIDU AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS R/AT 49, SIMHADRI KRISHNA RESIDENCY II,DR. VISHNU ROAD NEAR VARAGARDENS, R.R. NAGAR 5TH STAGE, RAJARAJESHWARINAGAR BENGALURU SOUTH BENGALURU DISTRICT-560098. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. NISHIT KUMAR SHETTY,ADV.,) AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA BY RAJAGOPALANAGAR POLICE STATION REP. BYSTATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT BUILDINGS BANGALORE -560 001. 2. M/S. FLEURDELIS TECHNOLOGIES PVT LTD, O/AT NO.440, 4TH PHASE PEENYA INDUSTRIAL AREA BANGALORE 560058 Digitally signed by R MANJUNATHA Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010128442026 NC: 2026:KHC:53816 WP No.5751 of 2026 C/W WP No.18059 of 2024 REP. BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR MR. BHAVANI SHANKAR CHERUKURI S/O KANAKACHARYALU AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS R/AT G-1, TULIP BLOCK ESTEEM GARDENIA APARTMENT SHAHAKARNAGAR BANGALORE-560093. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. SURYA MUNKUNDARAJ, APP FOR R1) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA R/W SECTION 528 OF BNSS, 2023, PRAYING TOQUASHING / SET ASIDE THE ORDER DTD 25.04.24 PASSED IN C.C.NO.135/2018 (CRIME.NO.66/2015 OF RAJAGOPALA NAGAR POLICE STATION) BY THE 3RD A.C.M.M, BANGALORE ON APPLICATION FILED BY THE PETITIONER UNDER SECTION 239 OF CR.P.C FOR DISCHARGE OF THE PETITIONER FOR THE OFFENCE PUNISHABLE UNDER SECTIONS 120(B), 406, 417, 418, 506 R/W 34 OF IPC. (ANNEXURE-A) AND CONSEQUENTLY ALLOW THE APPLICATION FILED BY THE PETITIONER UNDER SECTION 239 OF CR.P.C AND DISCHARGE THE PETITIONER FOR THE OFFENCE PUNISHABLE UNDER SECTIONS 120(B), 406, 417, 418, 506 R/W 34 OF IPC& ETC. IN W.P. No.18059/2024: BETWEEN: 1. RIAZ AHMED (AS PER AADHAR CARD) MENTIONED AS RIYAZ AHMED IN CHARGESHEET S/O BASHEER AHMED AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS R/AT NO.107, P AND T COLONY 3RD CROSS, NEAR NANDINI MILK DEPOT R T NAGAR, - 3 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010128442026 NC: 2026:KHC:53816 WP No.5751 of 2026 C/W WP No.18059 of 2024 BENGALURU NORTH BANGALORE 560032. ...PETITIONER (BY SRI. NISHIT KUMAR SHETTY,ADV.,) AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA BY RAJAGOPALANAGAR POLICE STATION REPRESENTED BY STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT BUILDINGS BANGALORE - 560 001. 2. M/S FLEURDELIS TECHNOLOGIES PVT LTD REGISTERED UNDER COMPANY ACT 1956 O/AT NO. 440, 4TH PHASE PEENYA INDUSTRIAL AREA BANGALORE 560058 REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR MR. BHAVANI SHANKAR CHERUKURI S/O KANAKACHARYALU AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS R/AT NO. G-1, TULIP BLOCK ESTEEM GARDENIA APARTMENT SHAHAKARNAGAR BANGALORE - 560093. ...RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. SURYA MUNKUNDARAJ, APP FOR R1) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA R/W SECTION 482 OF CPC, 1973, PRAYING TO QUASH / SET ASIDE THE ORDER DTD. 25.04.2024 PASSED IN C.C.NO.135/2018 (CRIME NO. 66/2015 OF RAJAGOPALA NAGAR POLICE STATION) BY THE 3RD A.C.M.M, BANGALORE ON APPLICATION FILED BY THE PETITIONER UNDER SECTION 239 OF Cr.P.C. FOR - 4 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010128442026 NC: 2026:KHC:53816 WP No.5751 of 2026 C/W WP No.18059 of 2024 DISCHARGE OF THE PETITIONER FOR THE OFFENCE PUNISHABLE UNDER SECTIONS 120(B), 406, 417, 418, 506 R/W 34 OF IPC (ANNX-A) AND CONSEQUENTLY ALLOW THE APPLICATION FILED BY THE PETITIONER UNDER SECTION 239 OF Cr.P.C AND DISCHARGE THE PETITIONER FOR THE OFFENCE PUNISHABLE UNDER SECTIONS 120(B), 406, 417, 418, 506 R/W 34 OF IPC & ETC. THESE PETITIONS, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA ORAL ORDER After addressing the arguments for some time, learned counsel for the petitioners has filed the memo which reads as under: “The petitioners in the both the case permitted to withdraw the above case in W.P.No.5751/2026 and W.P.No.18059/2024 with liberty to challenge rejection of discharge application before the revisional Court, in the interest of justice.” 2. Placing the memo on record, petitions are dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for. Sd/- (V SRISHANANDA) JUDGE kcm List No.: 2 Sl No.: 9