Research › Search › Judgment

Patna High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 43651 (PAT)

Purnvasi @ Vishnu Yadav @ Vishnu Kumar v. The State of Bihar

CR. MISC./89437/2025 · 2026-02-04

Sandeep Kumar

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.89437 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-131 Year-2025 Thana- INDRAPURI District- Rohtas ====================================================== 1. Purnvasi @ Vishnu Yadav @ Vishnu Kumar son of Nepali yadav Resident Of village- Bhaisaha, Ps- Inderpuri, Dist- Rohtas 2. Banti Yadav @ Rupesh Kumar son of Manoj Singh @ Bhanu yadav Resident Of village- Bhaisaha, Ps- Inderpuri, Dist- Rohtas 3. Bagha Yadav @ Vikash Kumar son of Krishna Yadav Resident Of village- Bhaisaha, Ps- Inderpuri, Dist- Rohtas 4. Sangam Yadav @ Monu Kumar son of Gauri yadav @ Gauri Shankar Singh Resident Of village- Bhaisaha, Ps- Inderpuri, Dist- Rohtas 5. Sunil Yadav @ Sunil Kumar Son of Ghurfeli yadav Resident Of village- Manikpur, Ps- Indrapuri, Dist- Rohtas 6. Munna Yadav @ Dharmendra yadav Son of Indradeo yadav Resident Of village- Manikpur, Ps- Indrapuri, Dist- Rohtas 7. Rupesh Bhagat @ Rupesh Kumar son of Suresh Bhagat @ Suresh Yadav Resident Of village- Manikpur, Ps- Indrapuri, Dist- Rohtas ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Dhaneshwar Prasad Gupta, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Tarkeshwar Nath Thakur, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR ORAL ORDER 2 04-02-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for the State. 2. The petitioners apprehend their arrest in connection with Indrapuri P.S. Case No. 131 of 2025 registered for the offence under Sections 191(2), 190, 109, 118(1), 303(2), 351(2), 352 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita. 3. As per the prosecution case, petitioners and Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.89437 of 2025(2) dt.04-02-2026 2/3 other FIR named accused are alleged of assaulting the informant and even snatched Rs. 5500/- from the informant’s pocket 4. It has been submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioners that the petitioners are innocent and they have falsely been implicated in this case. It is next submitted that injury sustained by the informant is simple in nature. Petitioner nos. 2, 5, 6 and 7 have clean antecedent, petitioner nos. 3 and 4 has got one criminal antecedent and petitioner no. 1 has four criminal antecedents. 5. Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioners. 6. Considering the aforesaid submissions and the fact that the injury sustained by the informant is simple in nature, this application is allowed. 7. Let the petitioners, above named, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the concerned Court below within four weeks from today, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned J.M.- 1st Class, Dehri on Sone, Rohtas/ concerned Court below in connection with Indrapuri P.S. Case No. 131 of 2025, subject to the conditions laid down in Section 438(2) of the Code of Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.89437 of 2025(2) dt.04-02-2026 3/3 Criminal Procedure, 1973 / Section 482 of the BNSS. tusharika/- (Sandeep Kumar, J) U T